|
From: JP v. M. <jp...@ds...> - 2008-01-31 09:29:51
|
Hi Fritz, It is not working in the (my) real world because I have 2 entries with a "by fallback1.dsdeurne.nl" This is because the fallback-server is equipped with an ASSP-proxy as well. It would work if it would take the last entry of "fallback1.dsdeurne.nl" Now it is testing "89.250.176.7" while it should test "85.191.0.241" I think we're there if this anomaly is cracked too. JP Return-path: <hel...@ds...> Envelope-to: re...@kr... Delivery-date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:16:27 +0100 Received: from mail by www.ocserver5.net with spam-scanned (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from <hel...@ds...>) id 1JK93O-0006yy-2T for re...@kr...; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:16:27 +0100 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on www.ocserver5.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO, MISSING_SUBJECT,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,NO_REAL_NAME,TO_CC_NONE autolearn=no version=3.1.8 Received: from smtp.dsdeurne.nl ([82.150.128.198] helo=fallback1.dsdeurne.nl) by www.ocserver5.net with esmtp (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from <hel...@ds...>) id 1JK93N-0006yu-PB for re...@kr...; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:16:21 +0100 Received: from fallback1.dsdeurne.nl ([89.250.176.3] helo=fallback1.dsdeurne.nl) by roundup5.tangos.nl; 30 Jan 2008 10:16:23 +0100 Received: from mail.hetemail.com (roundup2.tangos.nl [89.250.176.7]) by fallback1.dsdeurne.nl (8.13.7/8.13.7) with SMTP id m0U9FNJE003052 for <re...@kr...>; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:15:39 +0100 Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:15:23 +0100 From: hel...@ds... Message-Id: <200...@fa...> Received: from mail.hetemail.com ([85.191.0.241] helo=mail.hetemail.com) by fallback1.dsdeurne.nl; 30 Jan 2008 10:15:23 +0100 X-Assp-Delay: delayed for 5m 2s; 30 Jan 2008 10:15:39 +0100 X-Assp-Message-Score: -15 (Home Country Bonus NL - block for PI assignments) X-Assp-Received-SPF: neutral ip=85.191.0.241 mai...@ds... helo=mail.hetemail.com X-Assp-Message/IP-Score: 0 (SPF neutral) X-Assp-Envelope-From: hel...@ds... X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus |