Re: [Assp-user] Feature suggestion

[Christian R. <cr...@cr...>]

> Amazing argument.., 

:-))

> whatever put the spamcop address into the ccspam address and 
> select via collection mode what type of spam should be send 
> to spamcop, you can even use your spamcollection addresses as 
> a filter for ccspam.

So I did ... and failed

So i went into the SC-newsgroup ang get the following answer (Just the
important part)

---

Many people who operate mailservers are interested in a way to forward
items directly to the SC parser, but....

The parser was designed to expect mail which is forwarded as an
attachment.  That means that a mail which is received at the submit
address is expected to be of the configuration:  -1- a complete set of
headers representing the path from the email reporter to the spamcop
server and an empty line followed by -2- body mime structure describing
the email attachment -3- a complete set of headers representing the path
of the spam to the reporter then an empty line and -4- the spambody
followed by any other subsequent mime structures of email attachments of
more spams + spambodies.

The typical configuration of a mail which is forwarded to the parser
consists of a single set of headers which demonstrate the paths from
bottom to top of spamsource to reporter to spamcop server followed by
the spambody.  

---

I'm dreaming about a kind of interface between ASSP and SC (or other
DNSBLs too) to catch the spamming hosts almost in realtime - that would
be great.


Mit freundlichen Gru?en

Christian Rehkopf

> 
> 
>