Re: [Assp-user] newsletters idenified as spam.. 1.1.2b6

[Marrco <as...@mi...>]

i simply don't use bayes. Too many problems, and no real benefits over a =
well configured antispam system


graylisting + rbf + helo filtering + Blacklisted Domains is enough for =
me, with near to 0% false positives=20

(this is my raccomanded dnsbl setting, really safe, so 'maximum hits' is =
set to 1)

sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net
list.dsbl.org
combined.njabl.org


  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Dickson, Paul=20
  To: ass...@li...=20
  Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 2:13 PM
  Subject: [Assp-user] newsletters idenified as spam.. 1.1.2b6


  How does the rest of the community handle this?  I've been monitoring =
the mailbox that forwards to both "This is not spam" and "Whitelist", =
and see that most of what people forward as falsely tagged HAM are =
newsletters. =20

  =20

  We are currently in Bayesian testing mode, with the rest of the =
features in full effect.  Once we go out of testing mode, if we ever do, =
I'm not sure how we will handle newsletters where there is no one on the =
sending side to receive the "500 error" message and do the appropriate =
action to get whitelisted.=20

  =20

  =20

  How is the rest of the community dealing with this?

  =20

  =20

  Thanks!

  Paul