|
From: Charles M. <CM...@Me...> - 2005-11-18 19:41:28
|
Jeff Buehler wrote: >>> XMail is great, stable, fast and runs on Windows as a service, as >>> well as Linux, *BSD, etc. It is a little non-graphical in nature for >>> most Windows users, but I have been using for about 5 years to handle >>> thousands of emails a day and it works great with ASSP. >> But it apparently doesn't do IMAP, which is the only way to go for >> email... :) > IMAP is the only way to go IF you aren't hosting hundreds (or > thousands, or more) of different users. I prefer POP3 for hosting - I > like users to download email and get it off my servers (not that they > have to, but in general everyone configures POP3 that way). But we weren't talking about from a hosting perspective... And that said, there are lots of large hosting companies that offer IMAP access, some very inexpensively. As long as they properly implement quota's, storage shgouldn't be a problem, and it gives them another revenue stream as well (charge more for more storage). > You can use both IMAP and SSL with XMail by the way. There is a > how-to with Courier IMAP (which may or may not be available under > Windows - I would run run FreeBSD if you can anyway) and there is a > compiled version with SSL support that I have not tried, so there are > work arounds for these two issues. Good point - but I prefer Postfix for my MTA, anbd Courier for my IMAP server. I love maildir - now if the Mozilla people would just get their act together and build native support for maildir in Thunderbird... -- Charles |