arsperl-devel — ARSperl Internals (Developer) Discussions

RE: [Arsperl-devel] prebuilt win32 binary is both ARS and ARS182

[<jar...@te...>]

A typo in ars182.ppd

Should have been <SOFTPKG NAME=3D"ARS" VERSION=3D"1,82"> and not =
<SOFTPKG NAME=3D"ARS182" VERSION=3D"1,82">

--
Jarl

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ars...@ar...
> [mailto:ars...@ar...]On Behalf Of Jeff McCarrell
> Sent: 29. september 2004 00:37
> To: ars...@ar...
> Subject: [Arsperl-devel] prebuilt win32 binary is both ARS and ARS182
>=20
>=20
> Below is the text given when I uninstall arsperl 1.82
> Note the ARS182 in the list...
>=20
> unlink C:\apps\perl-5.8.4\site\lib\auto\ARS\autosplit.ix
> unlink C:\apps\perl-5.8.4\site\lib\auto\ARS182\.packlist
>                                            ^^^
> Successfully removed ARS182 version 1.82 from ActivePerl 5.8.4.810.
>=20
> I don't know that this is specifically causing problems, but...
>=20
> -- jeff
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on=20
> ITManagersJournal
> Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of=20
> them. Give us
> Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to=20
> find out more
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
> _______________________________________________
> Arsperl-devel mailing list
> Ars...@ar...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arsperl-devel
>=20

RE: [Arsperl-devel] can't compile on win32: not building autospli t.ix

[Jeff M. <Jef...@Re...>]

Ok, the problem came from this line from Makefile.PL:

       'PM' =>{ '_h2ph_pre.ph' => '$(INST_LIBDIR)/_h2ph_pre.ph' },

which I un-commented out since I thought we would want _h2ph_pre.h
installed.

It appears from the perl docs that this probably isn't what we want to do.

The revision back to get it working is checked in...

-- jeff


-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff McCarrell 
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 5:08 PM
To: 'ars...@ar...'
Subject: RE: [Arsperl-devel] can't compile on win32: not building
autospli t.ix


Ok, I went back and got 1.82 and compiled it;
sure enough it is creating autosplit.ix,
so the problem must be in the set of changes between
1.82 and the current head revision.

I'll look into it some more.

-- jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: jeff murphy [mailto:jcm...@je...]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 4:38 PM
To: ars...@ar...
Subject: Re: [Arsperl-devel] can't compile on win32: not building
autosplit.ix


compiles ok under linux. did you review the diffs between the 1.82 and
the latest CVS?

On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 18:48, Jeff McCarrell wrote:
> Hi guys.
> 
> I can't get the current code to compile; the autoloader generated file 
> autosplit.ix
> is not getting generated and built, so nmake test fails all tests.
> 
> Clearly autosplit.ix used to get generated, and it is part of Matt's
binary
> installs.
> 
> I've deleted and re-installed my perl installation, so it isn't anything
> I've done to
> my local perl.
> I've updated to the latest arsperl sources in CVS.
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
> -- jeff
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
> Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
> Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out
more
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
> _______________________________________________
> Arsperl-devel mailing list
> Ars...@ar...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arsperl-devel
> 



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Arsperl-devel mailing list
Ars...@ar...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arsperl-devel



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Arsperl-devel mailing list
Ars...@ar...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arsperl-devel

RE: [Arsperl-devel] arsperl 1.82 for win32 depends on arapi50.dll

[Jeff M. <Jef...@Re...>]

I'll see what I can do to have the discussion here about a run-time license
so we can re-distribute the libs.

-- jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: jeff murphy [mailto:jcm...@je...]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 4:35 PM
To: ars...@ar...
Subject: Re: [Arsperl-devel] arsperl 1.82 for win32 depends on
arapi50.dll


any possibility of Remedy releasing static libraries? or perhaps giving
us a run-time license on the dynamic libraries so we can include them in
the distribution?

   
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 18:23, Jeff McCarrell wrote:
> Hi guys.
> 
> The pre-built win32 binary we have published depends on (was built
against)
> the 5.x version
> of the arapi, which is published as arapi50.dll, or arapi51.dll
> 
> This means that folks have to have this dll to use the prebuilt 1.82
> modules.
> If you don't have it, the user gets a error message about that dll not
being
> found,
> and the program exits.
> 
> For a 6.x only install, this seems wrong.
> The user shouldn't have to install a 5.x dll to use arsperl on the 6.x
> servers.
> 
> Seems to me that we need to provide prebuilt binaries compiled against the
> 6.0.1
> version of the libs.  Here's a table of some common releases and the dll
> that we need
> to link against:
> 
> 
> 5.1.2		arapi51.dll
> 6.0		arapi60.dll
> 6.0.1		arapi60.dll
> 6.3		arapi63.dll
> 
> Seems like we need to build more binary versions...
> 
> thoughts?
> 
> -- jeff

RE: [Arsperl-devel] can't compile on win32: not building autospli t.ix

[Jeff M. <Jef...@Re...>]

Ok, I went back and got 1.82 and compiled it;
sure enough it is creating autosplit.ix,
so the problem must be in the set of changes between
1.82 and the current head revision.

I'll look into it some more.

-- jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: jeff murphy [mailto:jcm...@je...]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 4:38 PM
To: ars...@ar...
Subject: Re: [Arsperl-devel] can't compile on win32: not building
autosplit.ix


compiles ok under linux. did you review the diffs between the 1.82 and
the latest CVS?

On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 18:48, Jeff McCarrell wrote:
> Hi guys.
> 
> I can't get the current code to compile; the autoloader generated file 
> autosplit.ix
> is not getting generated and built, so nmake test fails all tests.
> 
> Clearly autosplit.ix used to get generated, and it is part of Matt's
binary
> installs.
> 
> I've deleted and re-installed my perl installation, so it isn't anything
> I've done to
> my local perl.
> I've updated to the latest arsperl sources in CVS.
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
> -- jeff
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
> Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
> Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out
more
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
> _______________________________________________
> Arsperl-devel mailing list
> Ars...@ar...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arsperl-devel
> 



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Arsperl-devel mailing list
Ars...@ar...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arsperl-devel

Re: [Arsperl-devel] can't compile on win32: not building autosplit.ix

[jeff m. <jcm...@je...>]

compiles ok under linux. did you review the diffs between the 1.82 and
the latest CVS?

On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 18:48, Jeff McCarrell wrote:
> Hi guys.
> 
> I can't get the current code to compile; the autoloader generated file 
> autosplit.ix
> is not getting generated and built, so nmake test fails all tests.
> 
> Clearly autosplit.ix used to get generated, and it is part of Matt's binary
> installs.
> 
> I've deleted and re-installed my perl installation, so it isn't anything
> I've done to
> my local perl.
> I've updated to the latest arsperl sources in CVS.
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
> -- jeff
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
> Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
> Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
> _______________________________________________
> Arsperl-devel mailing list
> Ars...@ar...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arsperl-devel
> 

Re: [Arsperl-devel] arsperl 1.82 for win32 depends on arapi50.dll

[jeff m. <jcm...@je...>]

any possibility of Remedy releasing static libraries? or perhaps giving
us a run-time license on the dynamic libraries so we can include them in
the distribution?

   
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 18:23, Jeff McCarrell wrote:
> Hi guys.
> 
> The pre-built win32 binary we have published depends on (was built against)
> the 5.x version
> of the arapi, which is published as arapi50.dll, or arapi51.dll
> 
> This means that folks have to have this dll to use the prebuilt 1.82
> modules.
> If you don't have it, the user gets a error message about that dll not being
> found,
> and the program exits.
> 
> For a 6.x only install, this seems wrong.
> The user shouldn't have to install a 5.x dll to use arsperl on the 6.x
> servers.
> 
> Seems to me that we need to provide prebuilt binaries compiled against the
> 6.0.1
> version of the libs.  Here's a table of some common releases and the dll
> that we need
> to link against:
> 
> 
> 5.1.2		arapi51.dll
> 6.0		arapi60.dll
> 6.0.1		arapi60.dll
> 6.3		arapi63.dll
> 
> Seems like we need to build more binary versions...
> 
> thoughts?
> 
> -- jeff
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
> Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
> Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
> _______________________________________________
> Arsperl-devel mailing list
> Ars...@ar...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arsperl-devel
> 

[Arsperl-devel] can't compile on win32: not building autosplit.ix

[Jeff M. <Jef...@Re...>]

Hi guys.

I can't get the current code to compile; the autoloader generated file 
autosplit.ix
is not getting generated and built, so nmake test fails all tests.

Clearly autosplit.ix used to get generated, and it is part of Matt's binary
installs.

I've deleted and re-installed my perl installation, so it isn't anything
I've done to
my local perl.
I've updated to the latest arsperl sources in CVS.

Any thoughts?

-- jeff

[Arsperl-devel] prebuilt win32 binary is both ARS and ARS182

[Jeff M. <Jef...@Re...>]

Below is the text given when I uninstall arsperl 1.82
Note the ARS182 in the list...

unlink C:\apps\perl-5.8.4\site\lib\auto\ARS\autosplit.ix
unlink C:\apps\perl-5.8.4\site\lib\auto\ARS182\.packlist
                                           ^^^
Successfully removed ARS182 version 1.82 from ActivePerl 5.8.4.810.

I don't know that this is specifically causing problems, but...

-- jeff

[Arsperl-devel] arsperl 1.82 for win32 depends on arapi50.dll

[Jeff M. <Jef...@Re...>]

Hi guys.

The pre-built win32 binary we have published depends on (was built against)
the 5.x version
of the arapi, which is published as arapi50.dll, or arapi51.dll

This means that folks have to have this dll to use the prebuilt 1.82
modules.
If you don't have it, the user gets a error message about that dll not being
found,
and the program exits.

For a 6.x only install, this seems wrong.
The user shouldn't have to install a 5.x dll to use arsperl on the 6.x
servers.

Seems to me that we need to provide prebuilt binaries compiled against the
6.0.1
version of the libs.  Here's a table of some common releases and the dll
that we need
to link against:


5.1.2		arapi51.dll
6.0		arapi60.dll
6.0.1		arapi60.dll
6.3		arapi63.dll

Seems like we need to build more binary versions...

thoughts?

-- jeff

Re: [Arsperl-devel] 1.82 version mismatch

[Jeff M. <jcm...@je...>]

On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 14:19 -0400, Jeff Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 10:56 -0700, Jeff McCarrell wrote:
> > make test is giving me:
> > 
> > ARS object version 1.82 does not match bootstrap parameter 1.8002 at
> > C:/apps/perl-5.8.4/lib/DynaLoader.pm line 253.
> > 
> > I see that ARS.pm defines version as:
> > 
> > $ARS::VERSION   = '1.82';
> > 
> > Ideas?
> 
> no idea. del blib


have to remember to finish my thoughts.


make test operates out of blib so it doesnt need to actually install the
module. my only thought is to watch the test lines, see exactly where
it's loading the module from, and delete those modules/directories
before building.


alternately, search your system for any ARS.so ARS.bs files or whatever
it is under windows .... and delete them. it looks like it's somehow
finding an old module and loading it. the current source doesnt have any
refs to 1.8002

jeff

Re: [Arsperl-devel] 1.82 version mismatch

[Jeff M. <jcm...@je...>]

On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 10:56 -0700, Jeff McCarrell wrote:
> make test is giving me:
> 
> ARS object version 1.82 does not match bootstrap parameter 1.8002 at
> C:/apps/perl-5.8.4/lib/DynaLoader.pm line 253.
> 
> I see that ARS.pm defines version as:
> 
> $ARS::VERSION   = '1.82';
> 
> Ideas?

no idea. del blib

[Arsperl-devel] 1.82 version mismatch

[Jeff M. <Jef...@Re...>]

make test is giving me:

ARS object version 1.82 does not match bootstrap parameter 1.8002 at
C:/apps/perl-5.8.4/lib/DynaLoader.pm line 253.

I see that ARS.pm defines version as:

$ARS::VERSION   = '1.82';

Ideas?

-- jeff

RE: [Arsperl-devel] ARSperl release plan + html/manual issue

[Jeff M. <Jef...@Re...>]

Ok, changes are checked in.

Now the code compiles with no warnings against the 6.0.1 server on win32.

-- jeff


-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Murphy [mailto:jcm...@os...]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 6:18 AM
To: ars...@ar...
Subject: Re: [Arsperl-devel] ARSperl release plan + html/manual issue

release stuff-
 yes. check it in. cvs should recognize the changes i made
 (above) and merge your changes. if it doesnt, just do something
 appropriate :-)

jeff

Re: [Arsperl-devel] ARSperl release plan + html/manual issue

[Jeff M. <jcm...@os...>]

html/manual issue - 
 there was a duplicate file, with a different case. i deleted the
 dup and updated the MANIFEST file

release stuff-
 yes. check it in. cvs should recognize the changes i made
 (above) and merge your changes. if it doesnt, just do something
 appropriate :-)

jeff


On Wednesday 22 September 2004 09:27 pm, Jeff McCarrell wrote:
> Hi guys.
>
> Have we decided on how we are going to do future releases?
> I've made several preliminary changes (reducing compiler warnings
> on win32 from a couple hundred to 10) that I would like to check in.
>
> After that as time allows, I want to improve the test suite that
> make test
> invokes.
>
> Should I just check this stuff in?
>
> -- jeff
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
> Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
> who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
> Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
> _______________________________________________
> Arsperl-devel mailing list
> Ars...@ar...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arsperl-devel

[Arsperl-devel] ARSperl release plan

[Jeff M. <Jef...@Re...>]

Hi guys.

Have we decided on how we are going to do future releases?
I've made several preliminary changes (reducing compiler warnings
on win32 from a couple hundred to 10) that I would like to check in.

After that as time allows, I want to improve the test suite that 
make test
invokes.

Should I just check this stuff in?

-- jeff

[Arsperl-devel] Missing file: html/manual/ars_perl_qualifier.html

[Jeff M. <Jef...@Re...>]

Warning: the following files are missing in your kit:
        html/manual/ars_perl_qualifier.html

When I build, perl Makefile.PL tells me about ars_perl_qualifier.html.

This is with the most current sources from CVS.
Anybody know what to do about this?

-- jeff

RE: [Arsperl-devel] 1.82 compiled versions uploaded

[Reinfeldt, M. <Mat...@us...>]

that's fine.  Just let me know when to pull them.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Murphy [mailto:jcm...@je...]
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 11:59 AM
To: ars...@ar...
Subject: RE: [Arsperl-devel] 1.82 compiled versions uploaded


On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 11:12 -0500, Reinfeldt, Matt wrote:
> Should I go ahead and remove all binary packages from my site now?  Or
> should I wait until the move to sf.net and CPAN has been sent to the
arslist
> and arsperl lists?

you should probably wait. i'm swamped at work and the mailing list thing
will have to slide a day or two.





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
_______________________________________________
Arsperl-devel mailing list
Ars...@ar...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arsperl-devel

RE: [Arsperl-devel] 1.82 compiled versions uploaded

[Jeff M. <jcm...@je...>]

On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 11:12 -0500, Reinfeldt, Matt wrote:
> Should I go ahead and remove all binary packages from my site now?  Or
> should I wait until the move to sf.net and CPAN has been sent to the arslist
> and arsperl lists?

you should probably wait. i'm swamped at work and the mailing list thing
will have to slide a day or two.

RE: [Arsperl-devel] 1.82 compiled versions uploaded

[Reinfeldt, M. <Mat...@us...>]

Should I go ahead and remove all binary packages from my site now?  Or
should I wait until the move to sf.net and CPAN has been sent to the arslist
and arsperl lists?

Matt

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Murphy [mailto:jcm...@je...]
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 10:55 AM
To: ars...@ar...
Subject: Re: [Arsperl-devel] 1.82 compiled versions uploaded


posted to project


On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 07:55 -0500, Reinfeldt, Matt wrote:
> Jeff,
> 
> I just uploaded two more files:
> 
> arsperl_182_601_unencrypted.zip
> arsperl_182_601_encrypted.zip
> 
> I've been working with the unencrypted version with no issues.




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
_______________________________________________
Arsperl-devel mailing list
Ars...@ar...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arsperl-devel

Re: [Arsperl-devel] 1.82 compiled versions uploaded

[Jeff M. <jcm...@je...>]

posted to project


On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 07:55 -0500, Reinfeldt, Matt wrote:
> Jeff,
> 
> I just uploaded two more files:
> 
> arsperl_182_601_unencrypted.zip
> arsperl_182_601_encrypted.zip
> 
> I've been working with the unencrypted version with no issues.

[Arsperl-devel] 1.82 compiled versions uploaded

[Reinfeldt, M. <Mat...@us...>]

Jeff,

I just uploaded two more files:

arsperl_182_601_unencrypted.zip
arsperl_182_601_encrypted.zip

I've been working with the unencrypted version with no issues.

Matt

RE: [Arsperl-devel] Re: ARSPerl and support for earrly versions.. ..

[Reinfeldt, M. <Mat...@us...>]

Sounds good.  The new compiled 1.82 packages are almost ready (with HTML
included).  I'll let you know when I upload them.

Matt

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Murphy [mailto:jcm...@je...]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 10:35 AM
To: ars...@ar...
Subject: RE: [Arsperl-devel] Re: ARSPerl and support for earrly versions..
..


On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 09:36 -0500, Reinfeldt, Matt wrote:
> Jeff,
> 
> are you going to keep them all listed under 1.82 or will you break them
out
> by actual version?  

woops! i'll fix that



> Secondly, take a look at the release notes:
> http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=269554  ... it
looks
> like all the line-breaks got stripped.

ok



> 
> Matt
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Murphy [mailto:jcm...@je...]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 8:26 AM
> To: ars...@ar...
> Subject: RE: [Arsperl-devel] Re: ARSPerl and support for earrly versions..
> ..
> 
> 
> On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 08:09 -0500, Reinfeldt, Matt wrote:
> > Jeff,
> > 
> > will we be uploading past versions of ARSPerl to sf.net for others to
> > download?  I know I have a few of the compiled versions still laying
> around
> > that I could send to you (or upload if I ever figure out how to do
that...
> > ;-)
> > 
> 
> upload whatever you feel is appropriate to ftp://upload.sf.net/uploads
> 
> and i'll post them to the project. 
> 
> > Matt
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jeff Murphy [mailto:jcm...@je...]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 7:58 AM
> > Cc: ars...@li...
> > Subject: [Arsperl-devel] Re: ARSPerl and support for earrly versions....
> > 
> > 
> > the standard answer that we'll give is that we'll support the current
> > release of ARsystem and one release behind (basically they same as
> > Remedy does). that means 6.x and 5.x currently. 
> > 
> > at UB, we are still on 4.5, so obviously i'm going to make sure that
> > ARSperl continues to work on that.
> > 
> > if people have issues with  revisions of ARsystem other than those that
> > we officially support, the standard answer we give them should be
> > "upgrade to a supported release of ARsystem". 
> > 
> > if by "support" you mean "have code in place that works for those
> > systems" then at this time i'd oppose spending time on removing code in
> > favor of focusing on 2.0
> > 
> > jeff
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 08:50 +0200, jar...@te... wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Any thougts of decide how many versions of AR System ARSPerl should
> > support? Is there any need to still support ie v3.x?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Jarl
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
> > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
> > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
> > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
> > _______________________________________________
> > Arsperl-devel mailing list
> > Ars...@ar...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arsperl-devel
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
> > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
> > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
> > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
> > _______________________________________________
> > Arsperl-devel mailing list
> > Ars...@ar...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arsperl-devel
> > 
> -- 
> Jeff Murphy <jcm...@je...>
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
> Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
> who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
> Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
> _______________________________________________
> Arsperl-devel mailing list
> Ars...@ar...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arsperl-devel
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
> Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
> who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
> Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
> _______________________________________________
> Arsperl-devel mailing list
> Ars...@ar...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arsperl-devel
> 
-- 
Jeff Murphy <jcm...@je...>



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
_______________________________________________
Arsperl-devel mailing list
Ars...@ar...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arsperl-devel

RE: [Arsperl-devel] Re: ARSPerl and support for earrly versions.. ..

[Jeff M. <jcm...@je...>]

On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 09:36 -0500, Reinfeldt, Matt wrote:
> Jeff,
> 
> are you going to keep them all listed under 1.82 or will you break them out
> by actual version?  

woops! i'll fix that



> Secondly, take a look at the release notes:
> http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=269554  ... it looks
> like all the line-breaks got stripped.

ok



> 
> Matt
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Murphy [mailto:jcm...@je...]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 8:26 AM
> To: ars...@ar...
> Subject: RE: [Arsperl-devel] Re: ARSPerl and support for earrly versions..
> ..
> 
> 
> On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 08:09 -0500, Reinfeldt, Matt wrote:
> > Jeff,
> > 
> > will we be uploading past versions of ARSPerl to sf.net for others to
> > download?  I know I have a few of the compiled versions still laying
> around
> > that I could send to you (or upload if I ever figure out how to do that...
> > ;-)
> > 
> 
> upload whatever you feel is appropriate to ftp://upload.sf.net/uploads
> 
> and i'll post them to the project. 
> 
> > Matt
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jeff Murphy [mailto:jcm...@je...]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 7:58 AM
> > Cc: ars...@li...
> > Subject: [Arsperl-devel] Re: ARSPerl and support for earrly versions....
> > 
> > 
> > the standard answer that we'll give is that we'll support the current
> > release of ARsystem and one release behind (basically they same as
> > Remedy does). that means 6.x and 5.x currently. 
> > 
> > at UB, we are still on 4.5, so obviously i'm going to make sure that
> > ARSperl continues to work on that.
> > 
> > if people have issues with  revisions of ARsystem other than those that
> > we officially support, the standard answer we give them should be
> > "upgrade to a supported release of ARsystem". 
> > 
> > if by "support" you mean "have code in place that works for those
> > systems" then at this time i'd oppose spending time on removing code in
> > favor of focusing on 2.0
> > 
> > jeff
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 08:50 +0200, jar...@te... wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Any thougts of decide how many versions of AR System ARSPerl should
> > support? Is there any need to still support ie v3.x?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Jarl
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
> > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
> > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
> > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
> > _______________________________________________
> > Arsperl-devel mailing list
> > Ars...@ar...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arsperl-devel
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
> > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
> > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
> > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
> > _______________________________________________
> > Arsperl-devel mailing list
> > Ars...@ar...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arsperl-devel
> > 
> -- 
> Jeff Murphy <jcm...@je...>
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
> Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
> who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
> Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
> _______________________________________________
> Arsperl-devel mailing list
> Ars...@ar...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arsperl-devel
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
> Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
> who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
> Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
> _______________________________________________
> Arsperl-devel mailing list
> Ars...@ar...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arsperl-devel
> 
-- 
Jeff Murphy <jcm...@je...>

RE: [Arsperl-devel] Re: ARSPerl and support for earrly versions.. ..

[Reinfeldt, M. <Mat...@us...>]

Jeff,

are you going to keep them all listed under 1.82 or will you break them out
by actual version?  Secondly, take a look at the release notes:
http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=269554  ... it looks
like all the line-breaks got stripped.

Matt

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Murphy [mailto:jcm...@je...]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 8:26 AM
To: ars...@ar...
Subject: RE: [Arsperl-devel] Re: ARSPerl and support for earrly versions..
..


On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 08:09 -0500, Reinfeldt, Matt wrote:
> Jeff,
> 
> will we be uploading past versions of ARSPerl to sf.net for others to
> download?  I know I have a few of the compiled versions still laying
around
> that I could send to you (or upload if I ever figure out how to do that...
> ;-)
> 

upload whatever you feel is appropriate to ftp://upload.sf.net/uploads

and i'll post them to the project. 

> Matt
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Murphy [mailto:jcm...@je...]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 7:58 AM
> Cc: ars...@li...
> Subject: [Arsperl-devel] Re: ARSPerl and support for earrly versions....
> 
> 
> the standard answer that we'll give is that we'll support the current
> release of ARsystem and one release behind (basically they same as
> Remedy does). that means 6.x and 5.x currently. 
> 
> at UB, we are still on 4.5, so obviously i'm going to make sure that
> ARSperl continues to work on that.
> 
> if people have issues with  revisions of ARsystem other than those that
> we officially support, the standard answer we give them should be
> "upgrade to a supported release of ARsystem". 
> 
> if by "support" you mean "have code in place that works for those
> systems" then at this time i'd oppose spending time on removing code in
> favor of focusing on 2.0
> 
> jeff
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 08:50 +0200, jar...@te... wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Any thougts of decide how many versions of AR System ARSPerl should
> support? Is there any need to still support ie v3.x?
> > 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Jarl
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
> Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
> who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
> Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
> _______________________________________________
> Arsperl-devel mailing list
> Ars...@ar...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arsperl-devel
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
> Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
> who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
> Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
> _______________________________________________
> Arsperl-devel mailing list
> Ars...@ar...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arsperl-devel
> 
-- 
Jeff Murphy <jcm...@je...>



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
_______________________________________________
Arsperl-devel mailing list
Ars...@ar...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arsperl-devel

RE: [Arsperl-devel] Re: ARSPerl and support for earrly versions.. ..

[Jeff M. <jcm...@je...>]

On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 08:09 -0500, Reinfeldt, Matt wrote:
> Jeff,
> 
> will we be uploading past versions of ARSPerl to sf.net for others to
> download?  I know I have a few of the compiled versions still laying around
> that I could send to you (or upload if I ever figure out how to do that...
> ;-)
> 

upload whatever you feel is appropriate to ftp://upload.sf.net/uploads

and i'll post them to the project. 

> Matt
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Murphy [mailto:jcm...@je...]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 7:58 AM
> Cc: ars...@li...
> Subject: [Arsperl-devel] Re: ARSPerl and support for earrly versions....
> 
> 
> the standard answer that we'll give is that we'll support the current
> release of ARsystem and one release behind (basically they same as
> Remedy does). that means 6.x and 5.x currently. 
> 
> at UB, we are still on 4.5, so obviously i'm going to make sure that
> ARSperl continues to work on that.
> 
> if people have issues with  revisions of ARsystem other than those that
> we officially support, the standard answer we give them should be
> "upgrade to a supported release of ARsystem". 
> 
> if by "support" you mean "have code in place that works for those
> systems" then at this time i'd oppose spending time on removing code in
> favor of focusing on 2.0
> 
> jeff
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 08:50 +0200, jar...@te... wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Any thougts of decide how many versions of AR System ARSPerl should
> support? Is there any need to still support ie v3.x?
> > 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Jarl
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
> Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
> who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
> Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
> _______________________________________________
> Arsperl-devel mailing list
> Ars...@ar...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arsperl-devel
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
> Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
> who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
> Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
> _______________________________________________
> Arsperl-devel mailing list
> Ars...@ar...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arsperl-devel
> 
-- 
Jeff Murphy <jcm...@je...>