Re: [j-devel] redefinition bug

[Andras S. <as...@ma...>]

On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Peter Graves wrote:

> I haven't put much thought or investigation into compiler policy yet,
> but I don't think ANSI would have a problem with not inlining anything
> unless speed > n for some value of n. And if n were to be 2 (or 3), not
> inlining anything would be the default (since speed defaults to 1),
> which is what you want for interactive development.
>
> I'll see if I can get this done soon. I'd do it right away, but I'm in
> the midst of hacking on the relevant files (nested FLETs!) and I need
> to clean things up a bit first.

I think it'd be a nice touch, but the more I think about this issue,
the less troubling it looks (see my other mail). Nested FLETs, and
probably a lot of other things are much more important!

Andras