[ archivemail-Bugs-1670422 ] archivemail python-2.5 fix

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Bugs item #1670422, was opened at 2007-02-28 02:00
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=456910&aid=1670422&group_id=49630

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: hawking2 (hawking2)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: archivemail python-2.5 fix

Initial Comment:
archivemail have problems running with python-2.5
 Here is the traceback:
hawking@mars:~ archivemail -d 5 .maildir/local
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/archivemail", line 1469, in <module>
    main()
  File "/usr/bin/archivemail", line 687, in main
    archive(mailbox_path)
  File "/usr/bin/archivemail", line 1130, in archive
    _archive_dir(mailbox_name, final_archive_name, "maildir")
  File "/usr/bin/archivemail", line 1270, in _archive_dir
    add_status_headers(msg)
  File "/usr/bin/archivemail", line 809, in add_status_headers
    match = re.search(":2,(.+)$", message.fp.name)
AttributeError: _ProxyFile instance has no attribute 'name'
 
 .maildir/local is a Maildir and message is a rfc822.Message instance.
  In python2.4 message.fp.name gives the path of the file where this message is
stored. In python2.5 this doesn't exist but same info is avaliable from
'message.fp._file.name'

  I've written a patch for archivemail-0.7.0 to check for python version and
decide whether to use message.fp.name or message.fp._file.name and the tool
seems to work fine.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=456910&aid=1670422&group_id=49630