From: Chris H. <ha...@de...> - 2004-11-24 10:48:39
|
Hello Luis, On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 01:43 +0000, Luis Matos wrote: > The point is that, in my opinion, in the site's page there are no > relations to sarge, no branch is there for it, or what branch (stable or > unstable) to use. I am still waiting for 1.3.7 to be accepted into testing. It is currently waiting in testing-proposed-updates. apt-proxy (1.3.7) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low * Resurrect version 1 for Sarge, because version 2 is still not stable enough to go into stable * When GNU sleep is available, sleep for smaller periods of time. This increases apt-proxy's responsiveness on faster machines. * Explicitly tell rsync which directory to use for its temporary files. (closes: #187094) * Add See also: apt-proxy-import to apt-proxy(8) * Fix apt-proxy.conf path in French manpage, thanks to Julien Louis * Prevent shell expansion of input lines * Add section about backing up the apt-proxy cache to FAQ * Update apt-proxy.conf manpage: - Clarify that MAX_VERSIONS is the only parameter that uses Packages files - Document WGET option, thanks Andree Leidenfrost (closes: #190926) - Document DEBUG option (closes: #194185) - Make it clear that apt-proxy does not need to be reloaded for changes to take effect * Update README: - Remove section about Debian Potato - Add FAQ about backing up apt-proxy cache http://ftp.debian.org/pool/main/a/apt-proxy/apt-proxy_1.3.7_all.deb Chris |