From: Luis M. <ga...@ot...> - 2004-11-23 01:43:55
|
I read that apt-proxy that is in unstable is a little bit unstable it self to go into sarge. The point is that woody servers are reaching an end, and new servers had to go directly to sarge if they whant to keep in debian. I have 2 server and a workstation served by an apt-proxy. I'm using sarge on both servers and workstation using apt-proxy stable with no trouble. The point is that, in my opinion, in the site's page there are no relations to sarge, no branch is there for it, or what branch (stable or unstable) to use. Some people have 2 or more workstations at home and want to install apt-proxy and they will install unstable and have the risk to have some break. For them it was also nice to have a sarge entry at the page. I don't say to create a testing branch, but to say " if you use sarge, install apt-proxy stable" or not. regards Luis Matos (sorry my lowsy english, but ...) |