From: Chris H. <ha...@de...> - 2004-01-20 15:08:58
|
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 15:52, mi wrote: > Chris Halls wrote: > >>* Can i delete the dkg-name.links directory which apt-proxy-import creates > >> (containing links to apt cache) manually ? > > Yes. Normally it would be deleted anyway (maybe it was interrupted)? > ok. > I used a-p-import two times, one with 'debug' option and one without > any option, > and both times it created the link dir without removing it. That's odd. The code only leaves the directory if the DEBUG variable is set: # remove directory if not debugging [ -z "$DEBUG" ] && rm -rf "$APT_PROXY_CACHE/dpkg-name.links/" > Would there be a problem if unattached links pile up there, > after cleaning the apt-cache ? No because that directory is only used by a-p-i > > Not really. It will eventually clean the files up, but you can clean > > them by hand too, if you want. > ok. > I just see a-p creates a 'packages.gz' as well as a 'packages' by > default, when updating from the net. > Why redundancy ? If you are using an rsync backend, it is more efficient to rsync 'Packages', so it does that, and then uses gzip to make a Packages.gz to send to clients. > One more question, for gnome2.2 backport i got a 'Release.nonexist'. > Is this a problem somehow ? I mean, there must be some good reason for > a release file ? > Package download to clients seem to work, though. It's not a big problem - a Release file contains extra information about a backend but is not essential. a-p cache's the fact that the Release file does not exist so it does not have to try the backend too frequently. > > If you're just starting out with apt-proxy, you might want to try the > > python rewrite, which is available from experimental and is much quicker > > than v1. > ok, but what do you mean with experimental ? Debian Sid ? No, see: http://www.de.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-resources#s-experimental > I don't want to ditch woody/stable, hopefully a-p-2 runs under woody > as well ? Oh, it needs twisted, which was not available in Woody, so no you can't use it I'm afraid. > Will i have to do something for a smooth transfer ? ap2 does have upgrade scripts and should automatically update for you, but it needs more testing. > I'll look for the a-p website, anyway. That's a little out of date at the moment. > > Apt-proxy-users mailing list > > Apt...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apt-proxy-users > You should add the website here.... for now i have to google ;-) http://apt-proxy.sf.net I don't have control over the footer mails added by the sourceforge mailing list software, sorry. Chris |