From: mi <mic...@gm...> - 2004-01-20 14:52:42
|
Chris Halls wrote: >>* Can i delete the dkg-name.links directory which apt-proxy-import creates >> (containing links to apt cache) manually ? > Yes. Normally it would be deleted anyway (maybe it was interrupted)? ok. I used a-p-import two times, one with 'debug' option and one without any option, and both times it created the link dir without removing it. Would there be a problem if unattached links pile up there, after cleaning the apt-cache ? It's a-p-import 1.16.2.2 2002/11/15, and i run Debian Woody 3.0r2. >>ls -l /var/cache/apt-proxy/debian/dists/woody/main/binary-i386/ >>-rw-r--r-- 1 aptproxy nogroup 6,3M 2004-01-15 03:42 Packages >>-rw-r--r-- 1 aptproxy nogroup 1,7M 2003-11-20 19:17 Packages.gz >>-rw-r--r-- 1 aptproxy nogroup 0 2004-01-19 04:30 >>Packages.gz.fail >>-rw-r--r-- 1 aptproxy nogroup 95 2003-11-20 19:57 Release >>-rw-r--r-- 1 aptproxy nogroup 0 2004-01-19 04:30 Release.fail >> Is there any problem with this ? > Not really. It will eventually clean the files up, but you can clean > them by hand too, if you want. ok. I just see a-p creates a 'packages.gz' as well as a 'packages' by default, when updating from the net. Why redundancy ? One more question, for gnome2.2 backport i got a 'Release.nonexist'. Is this a problem somehow ? I mean, there must be some good reason for a release file ? Package download to clients seem to work, though. > If you're just starting out with apt-proxy, you might want to try the > python rewrite, which is available from experimental and is much quicker > than v1. ok, but what do you mean with experimental ? Debian Sid ? I don't want to ditch woody/stable, hopefully a-p-2 runs under woody as well ? Will i have to do something for a smooth transfer ? I'll look for the a-p website, anyway. > Apt-proxy-users mailing list > Apt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apt-proxy-users You should add the website here.... for now i have to google ;-) Thanks for reply. -- mi. |