From: Aplaws D. L. <apl...@li...> - 2009-05-25 14:23:04
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=7408739 By: shawnlane 1. Aplaws was too hard to build before. It's now pretty simple with ecdc. Next steps would be to migrate to maven and to embed derby. 2. I think we should replace the output applications with Liferay (or equivalent) which does a much better job at layout, portlets, etc. By "output" I mean the content, navigation and portal applications. Totally agree with point 1 and 2. Once it becomes easy to build and deploy you will get more take up. Plus adding standards based portals would enable better expansion of the system and more plug in opportunities. I think this would also get SME's looking at it as an option. Rebuilding the interface for editing would be a major task, but using GWT might get more interest from developers. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=368401 |