From: Aplaws D. L. <apl...@li...> - 2009-05-25 09:43:17
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=7408371 By: shawnlane I think with the work you are doing, people looking for a JEE solution for content management will be able to just download and run, something that was very difficult with APLAWS without skilled developers. (NB many local authorities do not have any developers). To be constructive, I think areas that would make a difference is easy to set up and deploy sub site, with easily modifiable templates, it sounds like Mandalay solves the latter problem. >So, if we decide to replace APLAWS persistence by JCR, we should use a really free implementation like Apache's jackrabbit. Agree, it's not clear what Alfresco are doing, except to try and undercut products like Documentum and make money via support, training rather than straight licence fee. As a WCM product Alfresco is a long way from being complete. Performance is an issue which we fixed by buying a big expensive DB server and by implementing a severe squid apache layer. So another area is to sort out caching/performance, We have a lvs -> squid -> apache -> tomcat configuration and it's difficult for publishers to know if their published page is actually live! On our Intranet we went back to simpler apache with modcache -> mod proxy -> tomcat, which is fast and easier to deploy and a lot less painful than LVS route. PS I applaud you for the work you are doing on APLAWS! ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=368401 |