From: Aplaws D. L. <apl...@li...> - 2009-05-24 14:08:09
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=7407341 By: pboy Hi, | It was never designed from the ground up as an open source solution, I think it had been a Open Source project right from the begining when developed on MIT and Arsdigita Community System. But you are right, the APLAWS specific runtime system may have been a perfect solution in the short run, but obstructive in the long run. | The outside world things are moving on, specifications for | content repositories that APLAWS does not have for example. Compared to other Open Source CMS APLAWS has a lot of advantages and of features, others dont have. | specifications for content repositories that APLAWS | does not have for example There are only very few programs which follow that route (Alfresco for example). Most use a specific database backend or file system. End for the end user ir doesn't matter if the backend follows a repository framework. It's more a developer's concern. But again, you are right. We had better earlier taken up some of the ideas of the discussion on the last user meeting at Camden. But I think APLAWS / CCM has a lot of good and productive features and we are on the way to eliminate the bad side of the beast. :-) ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=368401 |