From: Aplaws D. L. <apl...@li...> - 2009-06-29 03:28:25
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=7468967 By: terry_permeance PURPOSE Glossary item should use a WYSIWYG editor CONFIGURATION ccm set com.arsdigita.cms.contenttypes.glossaryitem.use_dhtml_editor=true (to enable, false by default) ccm set com.arsdigita.cms.contenttypes.glossaryitem.fck_editor_config=<path> (uses fckconfig_forum.js by default) ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=368401 |
From: Aplaws D. L. <apl...@li...> - 2009-06-30 00:46:50
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=7470666 By: pboy Terry, I think that is a good idea and should be implemented. I did something similiar with a field of the event contenttyp and introduced > com.arsdigita.cms.contenttypes.event.use_html_date_description=false|true So may be should enable/disable dhtml on a per field base (as a systematic structure for any content type we may modify this way)? Peter ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=368401 |
From: Aplaws D. L. <apl...@li...> - 2009-06-30 01:03:10
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=7470687 By: pboy Terry, just have seen that you already have committed the patch. Nevertheless, we should introduce a nameing pattern, eg. c.ad.cms.<content-type>.<field-name>-as-rft or something like that. > ccm set com.arsdigita.cms.contenttypes.glossaryitem.fck_editor_config=<path> > (uses fckconfig_forum.js by default) I think fckconfig_forum as default is a bad idea because it introduces a horizontal dependency between modules (which is generally a bad design, especially in this case because they are independet by its purpose and usage). So it should either use a default configuration as specified in cms (because glossary is a ccm-cms-types-<module> so it generates no additional module dependency). Peter ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=368401 |
From: Aplaws D. L. <apl...@li...> - 2009-06-30 01:33:25
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=7470731 By: terry_permeance I'm not sure what "rft" is so I would propose the following convention: c.ad.ct.cms.<content-type>.<field-name>.editor=(wysiwyg|text) Regards, Terry P.S. I can't claim credit for the coding. I'm committing code from our new developer Tim Carpenter who is being inducted into APLAWS as we speak. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=368401 |
From: Aplaws D. L. <apl...@li...> - 2009-06-30 01:52:25
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=7470745 By: pboy Terry, > I'm not sure what "rft" rtf = richt text field, that is the term the dhtml editor people are naming the text area were a WYSIWYG editor is used instead of the plain text. > I can't claim credit for the coding. I'm committing code from our new developer Tim Carpenter > who is being inducted into APLAWS as we speak. Yes, I got his application for write access and will grant it to him asap. Peter ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=368401 |
From: Aplaws D. L. <apl...@li...> - 2009-06-30 03:00:37
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=7470834 By: terry_permeance Okay. I think we should use a term/acronym that anybody would know without doing a search. It's a usability issue I guess. It still prefer: c.adcms.ct.<content-type>.<field-name>.editor=(wysiwyg|text) where "text" is the default but I'll go with whatever the community thinks is best :-) Thanks, Terry ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=368401 |
From: Aplaws D. L. <apl...@li...> - 2009-06-30 06:35:13
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=7471028 By: pboy Terry, your proposal is much better and we should do that way. Peter ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=368401 |
From: Aplaws D. L. <apl...@li...> - 2009-07-09 06:56:26
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=7489682 By: terry_permeance Done. See r1953 NEW USAGE: ccm set com.arsdigita.cms.contenttypes.glossaryitem.definition.editor=text (default) ccm set com.arsdigita.cms.contenttypes.glossaryitem.definition.editor=wysiwyg ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=368401 |