Re: [apbs-users] APBS FD or FE

[Sorensen, J. <jes...@uc...>]

Ok, that's what I thought, but wanted to make certain. Time to explore the results more... Thanks Nathan

Best,
Jesper

On Jun 17, 2013, at 1:18 PM, "Baker, Nathan" <Nat...@pn...<mailto:Nat...@pn...>> wrote:

Hi Jesper,

mg-manual is finite difference.

Thanks,

--
Nathan Baker
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
+1-509-375-3997
http://nabaker.me


-----Original Message-----
From: Sorensen, Jesper [jes...@uc...<mailto:jes...@uc...>]
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 08:39 AM Pacific Standard Time
To: apb...@li...<mailto:apb...@li...>
Subject: [apbs-users] APBS FD or FE


Hello,

If I run a simple mg-manual calculation, am I using finite difference (FD) or finite element (FE)?
The reason I ask is that compared to other codes I have checked I am seeing a much greater convergence behavior with APBS as a function of grid resolution and I am wondering if that is because it is using FE and the other codes are using FD. The other codes surprisingly do not really show a clear convergence behavior with grid resolution, which puzzles me a bit.

Best regards,
Jesper
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
apbs-users mailing list
apb...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apbs-users