Re: [aopalliance-discuss] MethodInvocation.getArguments()...

[Bob L. <cra...@cr...>]

+1

On 8/28/05, Renaud Pawlak <ren...@in...> wrote:
>=20
> Hi James,
>=20
> You're right, this should be specified in the API.
> I guess that the cleanest is to return an empty array. For better
> performance, the implementing framework can return a reference to a
> global empty array.
>=20
> If everybody agrees, I will update the CVS and the docs.
>=20
> Cheers,
> /Renaud
>=20
> James Carman wrote:
> > I am working on the Jakarta Commons Proxy project (based on the AOP
> > Alliance API), and I don't know what the correct contract should be for
> > MethodInvocations when the method takes no parameters.  Should
> > getArguments() return null or an empty Object[]?
> >
>=20
>=20
> --
> Renaud Pawlak
> Researcher
> INRIA Futurs - Projet JACQUARD
> LIFL, UMR CNRS 8022, Equipe GOAL - B=E2timent M3
> 59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq C=E9dex - FRANCE
> Phone:  (+33) 328 778579
> Cell:   (+33) 662 001919
> Fax:    (+33) 328 778537
> Emails: ren...@in... / pa...@li...
> WWW:    http://www.lifl.fr/~pawlak
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
> September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practic=
es
> Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & Q=
A
> Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
> _______________________________________________
> aopalliance-discuss mailing list
> aop...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aopalliance-discuss
>