Re: [Aoetools-discuss] Page-caching
Brought to you by:
ecashin,
elcapitansam
From: Tracy R R. <tr...@ul...> - 2006-09-27 21:45:23
|
Anthony Wright wrote: > I hate to say it, but page caching isn't actually desirable for vblade > because it means that if the machine vblade is running on crashes the > data you thought you're filesystem or raid array thought it had written > to disk was actually still in memory on the vblade machine. This can > lead to corrupted raid arrays - look up all the bad experiences of write > caching on raid arrays. I beg to differ. I have used various big disk array products from StorageTek, EMC, MTI, and others and they all did caching in the disk array controller itself (analogous to the AoE server in our case) and they had battery backups to guarantee that data would get written to disk. On the first sign of power failure these machines would flush their cache and power themselves off. My AoE servers have 512M of RAM each and I'm sure that 512M of RAM really helps with IO performance on the cpu nodes. -- Tracy R Reed http://ultraviolet.org A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right Q: Why should I start my reply below the quoted text |