Re: [Amsn-lang] Brazillian Portuguese different from Portuguese spoken in Portugal- and I still agree with Lacetani

[I. <air...@us...>]

El Jueves, 1 de Mayo de 2003 16:37, Hatredman escribi=F3:
> Historians believe that, in
>
> Wed 30 Apr 2003 11:20, =C1lvaro J. Iradier said:
> > Are these translations suitable for the standard portuguese
> > language too? So, can I add them to langpt, or should I wait to
> > other translation? (I don't know how different they are)
>
> I think that they are usable, but if you are not in a hurry it is
> better to wait for a native from portugal to translate it.
>
> The two variants of portuguese are close. I really don't know if the
> coloquial form for the portuguese from Portugal is this, but the
> Brazillian form can be used without problem IN THIS CASE.
>
> Again, better wait for some native speaker.
>
> And I still agree with Lacetani: the "translated" key should contain
> the name of the translated language (Portugues, Catallan, Francais
> etc) and NOT the word "Translated".

Ok. Finally I won't used the "translated" key at all, as we already have th=
e=20
language name in the langlist file ;)

Greets.

> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Amsn-lang mailing list
> Ams...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-lang

=2D-=20
(=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D)
      Alvaro J. Iradier Muro
 air...@us...