Re: [Amsn-devel] aMSN2 and Telepathy

[Youness A. <kak...@ka...>]

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:31 AM, Boris 'billiob' Faure <bi...@gm...>wrote:

> I really don't like the dependency on DBUS, but that's the best way to
> achieve it.
>
I don't either, but without it, it becomes incredibly difficult to have a
client/server mode since we'd need to create our own IPC protocol which is
stupid.

My main issue about using telepathy is that we were going to have a
> kind of preview 0.1 release in september. Should we still aim at that
> goal? I think we should since we don't know how much time will be
> needed to integrate telepathy.
>
nah, don't worry about it, it can get released as is, then telepathy backend
switched on top of it for the future. The technology behind amsn2 doesn't
matter for users as long as it works, and amsn2 0.1 is meant for users to
try out amsn2, so let them try it, then don't need to know/care if we'll
change the underlying protocol abstraction or not.


>
> --
> Boris 'billiob' Faure
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program
> Be part of this innovative community and reach millions of netbook users
> worldwide. Take advantage of special opportunities to increase revenue and
> speed time-to-market. Join now, and jumpstart your future.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-atom-d2d
> _______________________________________________
> Amsn-devel mailing list
> Ams...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
>