Re: [amfphp] difference between amfphp 0.9 and 1

[Patrick M. <li...@5e...>]

Well, 0.9 is a whole lot slower. It's also a lot more painful to debug. 
It doesn't have support for a lot of charsets. But if it's working fine 
for you, then you can safely keep it installed.

I really don't think migrating from 0.9 to 1.0 should be that hard 
really. I'm not sure what you did exactly as far as authentication goes 
but you probably chose an overly complicated solution that you could 
quite simply get working more simply with a few minor changes. My 0.02$

Patrick

Cyriaque RIOS wrote:

>Hi,
>
>After asking in answer from another question i didn't receive answer =) so
>excuse my insistance =)
>
>Today I use 0.9, the upgrade to 1 seems to be very hard job for me (problem
>of session and credentials), so do you think I can continue to use the 0.9
>in term of speed, security, stability????
>
>I don't ask for the new features like serialisers etc, just for the basics
>functionalities ????
>
>
>Best Regards
>
>CR
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
>for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
>searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
>http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
>_______________________________________________
>amfphp-general mailing list
>amf...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amfphp-general
>
>  
>