From: Bernard M. <bme...@gm...> - 2008-04-29 23:00:59
|
Ok, so the existing assembler should work fine. On first glance I do see some differences, the main one is that the interrupt vectors are 4 bytes apart not two bytes apart as in the other devices. Also, the names in ATxmega128A1.inc a quite a bit different so names in the .asm files will have to change accordingly .. On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Matthias Trute <mt...@we...> wrote: > > > Quick question: Does amforth support the XMEGA with just the addition of > > the > > .asm in the /devices folder and the appropriate .inc file from ATMEL > > Studio? > > I hope so, but do not know it. The assembler code works with > very little modifications (mostly regarding the serial interface). > > > Or is a bit harder than that? > > maybe, but Atmel mentioned that existing atmega code works for atxmega > without modifications. > > bye > Matthias > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference > Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. > Use priority code J8TL2D2. > > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone > _______________________________________________ > Amforth-devel mailing list > Amf...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amforth-devel > |