Ok, so the existing assembler should work fine. On first glance I do see
some differences, the main one is that the interrupt vectors are 4 bytes
apart not two bytes apart as in the other devices.
Also, the names in ATxmega128A1.inc a quite a bit different so names in the
.asm files will have to change accordingly ..
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Matthias Trute <mt...@we...> wrote:
>
> > Quick question: Does amforth support the XMEGA with just the addition of
> > the
> > .asm in the /devices folder and the appropriate .inc file from ATMEL
> > Studio?
>
> I hope so, but do not know it. The assembler code works with
> very little modifications (mostly regarding the serial interface).
>
> > Or is a bit harder than that?
>
> maybe, but Atmel mentioned that existing atmega code works for atxmega
> without modifications.
>
> bye
> Matthias
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
> Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
> Use priority code J8TL2D2.
>
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
> _______________________________________________
> Amforth-devel mailing list
> Amf...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amforth-devel
>
|
