From: <jer...@tr...> - 2005-12-21 07:53:46
|
Ok guys, Many thank for your awnswer. I see more clearly now . J=E9r=F4me -----Original Message----- From: ama...@li... = [mailto:ama...@li...] On Behalf Of Mark = Martinec Sent: mardi 20 d=E9cembre 2005 14:42 To: ama...@li... Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] Include spamassassin in postfix OR in amavis = . Is there a difference ? Nokin, > Because I've already tunned my spamassassin (and spend some time on = it), I > don't want to change my setup for migrate spamassassin from postfix to > amavis. As Matthias pointed out, most of your work done on SA (local.cf, SARE) still work unchanged when SA is called from amavisd instead of from = spamd. Some per-recipient flexibilility is lost (e.g. per-recip Bayes and = rules), but the more important per-recip handling is still there = (white/black-listing, spam score levels (tag/tag2/kill), spam_lovers. > My question is : > There is a performance/security difference between these two = architectures > 1) Postfix speak directly to spamassassin AND NEXT to amavis (each '->' implies a file transfer): pf -> amavisd -> pf -> spamc -> spamd -> pf > 2) Postfix speak only to amavis which speak to spamassassin and the = avscan pf -> amavisd(+SA) -> pf (SA is given mail contens from amavisd in memory, virus scanners are given file names to be checked, no additional copying / file transfer is involved). Mark ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log = files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D7637&alloc_id=3D16865&op=3Dclick _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list AMa...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/ |