|
From: uwe s. f. <uf...@ph...> - 2004-04-20 20:45:42
|
Kevin,
You've got it right. I'm not the designer of that default setup, but I think the idea behind it was to keep those "most likely to be spam"-messages out of your mailbox, too, whereas the original sender does get a warning and therefore a chance to re-submit the message after editing when the spam score was high, but less than $sa_dsn_cutoff_level.
For me personally that makes sense and I'd go for that in the first step. Unfortunately I'm running a multi domain hosting server and some people over here don't feel comfortable with the chance of possibly loosing one ham message within 100 spam emails, so...
My current setup is:
$sa_tag_level_deflt = -999;
$sa_tag2_level_deflt = 4;
$sa_kill_level_deflt = 7;
$sa_dsn_cutoff_level = 10;
Uwe
At 22:21 2004-04-20, Kevin W. Gagel wrote:
>I understand it as:
> ...
>Assuming I understand it correctly then why is the default configuration to have
>$sa_kill_level_deflt set to $sa_tag2_level_deflt? That would mean I'd never see
>a spammy message as it would be rejected/discarded (as per my settings)...
|