|
From: Thomas N. <th...@te...> - 2004-04-20 09:25:24
|
uwe s. fuerst wrote: > David, > > What exact version of SA are you running? I'm asking, because I've been feeding my spam to SA 2.63's bayes DB for weeks (if not months,) but I, too, did not see any difference in the amount of spam being tagged. Since I'm sure that my setup was correct, I assume that today's spam just is too smart to be detected by an auto-learning algorithm like bayes?! > > The juice is: I've disabled autolearn and bayes within SA when I switched over to amavisd-new... > > Uwe > > > > At 04:21 2004-04-20, David Newman wrote: > >>We've been running amavisd-new/spamassassin/postfix for around a month. SA >>is set to autolearn, and amavisd-new is set to use SA. >>While the Bayes database is growing steadily, the amount of mail tagged as >>spam has not. Users' mailboxes are only slightly less clogged than before. >>Are we missing something to get amavisd-new to use SA Bayes learning? >>... > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > AMaViS-user mailing list > AMa...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user > AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 > AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/ Hi I'm no expert whatsoever, but since I managed to run amavisd-new, postifx and sa-learn with ham/spam mailboxes, i.e feeding ham and spam it appears that the spam has almost vanished..so I would recommend getting sa-learn working both with autolearn but also with the manual learn. If you run courier-imap for instance just create a shared maildir..works nicely and is easy to manage. Here is a good link http://x-si.org/articles/sharedmd.html |