Re: [AMaViS-user] amavisd-new and sa_dsn_cutoff_level

[Alexander H. <al...@bo...>]

Mark Martinec <Mar...@ij...> writes:

> Alexander,
>
> | ... users want spam_final-Dest to be D_PASS, so that we only taag
> | sensibly but lets the users decide on their own what to do with it,
> | and we use sa_dsn_cutoff_level set to 20 to cut out obvious spam, but
> | I still get logs like this one:
>
> The $sa_dsn_cutoff_level only affects DSN to be sent back to sender.
> It does not affect delivery of spam to recipient. To do that, use the
> kill_level (which in turn has no effect if spam_final-Dest is D_PASS)
>

Thanks, this is actually obvious when I read it and listen to what I'm
reading to myself :)

> | The mail got scored well above the cutoff-level, and got the
> | D_DISCARD-treatment, but the log actually prints "Passed" when "Not
> | Delivered" or some such alternativ. 
>
> What you want is:
>   $final_spam_destiny = D_BOUNCE;
>   $sa_tag2_level_deflt = 6.3;
>   $sa_kill_level_deflt = 20;
>   $sa_dsn_cutoff_level = 25;
>
> or:
>   $final_spam_destiny = D_DISCARD;
>   $sa_tag2_level_deflt = 6.3;
>   $sa_kill_level_deflt = 20;
>

Last one there did it, and once again, it's pretty obvious if I'd
stopped and thunk it through for a moment.

>
> Mark
>

mvh,
A

-- 
Alexander Hoogerhuis                               | al...@bo...
CCNP - CCDP - MCNE - CCSE                          | +47 908 21 485
"You have zero privacy anyway. Get over it."  --Scott McNealy