Re: [Alsa-user] driver approach
Brought to you by:
perex
|
From: <ale...@gm...> - 2005-09-28 11:26:04
|
> If by 'capture delay' you mean 'the maximum delay between a sample passing > thru the DAC and the time it is available to be read in user space', and > by > 'blocking delay' you mean the period time, then the two should be equal > (ignoring interrupt and proces scheduling time). Yes - but the problem is that it is not possible to choose only one period. With the minimum if 2 periods the capture delay is twice the blocking delay. One example : With 32kHz, 128 Samples/Frame the blocking delay is 4ms high so in fact I can send 128-sample-blocks each 4ms to my remote destination but it takes 2 periods resulting in 8ms to actually capture the signal and my approach is to get rid of this additional delay. Comments ? -- A l e x -- Dipl.-Ing. Alexander Carôt Email : Ale...@Ca... Tel.: +49 (0)177 5719797 phd-candidate at www.isnm.de Lust, ein paar Euro nebenbei zu verdienen? Ohne Kosten, ohne Risiko! Satte Provisionen für GMX Partner: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/partner |