Re: [Alsa-user] snd-card-sbawe or snd-sbawe?
Brought to you by:
perex
From: Jaroslav K. <pe...@su...> - 2002-03-04 13:51:33
|
On Sat, 2 Mar 2002, Roger E Critchlow Jr wrote: > Jaroslav Kysela writes: > > On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Roger E Critchlow Jr wrote: > > > > > Dale Harris writes: > > > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 03:14:53PM -0800, Dale Harris elucidated: > > > > > This is seems to be a recurring problem in the archives, but I didn't > > > > > see a resolution off hand. My problem, shown in /proc/asound/sndstat: > > > > > > > > > > Audio devices: NOT ENABLED IN CONFIG > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Okay, I now see Dave Andruczyk's post on alsa-devel: > > > > > > > > http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/12349/25/7947484/ > > > > > > > > about all the snd-card-xxxx changing to just snd-xxxx, so I guess the > > > > question is now is why isn't snd-sbawe configuring the audio devices? > > > > > > > > > > /proc/asound/sndstat reports the status of oss emulation. > > > > > > If you try an oss application and recheck /proc/asound/sndstat you'll > > > see the unenabled devices magically appearing as required. > > > > > > Yes, it is a wee bit confusing. > > > > It's not confusing. If you have not loaded OSS emulation modules, then > > sndstat reports that given interfaces are not available. It's clear, > > isn't? > > > > It's confusing because it calls itself /proc/asound/sndstat, but it > isn't _the_ status of _the_ sound system, it's the status of a > subsystem. > > If it were called /proc/asound/oss-sndstat, or if it's contents > clearly identified itself as the oss emulation status, or if there > were another status device which itemized the status of alsa itself in > the same way, then it would be less confusing. Ok, I followed your suggestion and created /proc/asound/oss directory and moved OSS related files there. Jaroslav ----- Jaroslav Kysela <pe...@su...> Linux Kernel Sound Maintainer ALSA Project http://www.alsa-project.org SuSE Linux http://www.suse.com |