From: Chris R. <chr...@gm...> - 2010-03-25 03:13:37
|
On Wednesday 24 March 2010 8:00:25 pm Evert Glebbeek wrote: > On 24 Mar 2010, at 22:49 , Peter Wang wrote: > >> Looks correct to me (unlike the above code). > > Actually, on second thought, (onoff && (display->flags & > ALLEGRO_FULLSCREEN_WINDOW != 0)) is probably what was intended there. > > > You can write > > > > (onoff == !!(display->flags & ALLEGRO_FULLSCREEN_WINDOW)) > > You could. > I think I prefer what I just came up with. :P I think the latter could optimize better, given C's requirement for short- circuiting. The former must not dereference 'display' if 'onoff' is false (forcing a branch), whereas the latter can possibly optimize out any branching because display->flags needs to be evaluated anyway. Granted, I have no idea if this is time-sensitive code that would benefit from such, but I figured I'd toss that out there. |