Re: [Aegis-developers] question about aeip

[Peter M. <mi...@ca...>]

On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 12:45 +0200, Walter Franzini wrote:
> Looking at the source of aegis/aeip.cc it seems to me that
> history_put_command is invoked even if the change being integrated is
> a branch.

yes, it is.

> Why we need to the add a new revision to the history when the branch
> itself can not be used to modify files?

The idea was 100% consistency in aeip, so both branches and simple
change sets do exactly the same thing.  Over time, however, more and
more inconsistencies have crept in.  One more is probably not a big
deal, so long as nobody can tell.


Regards
Peter Miller <mi...@ca...>
/\/\*        http://miller.emu.id.au/pmiller/

PGP public key ID: 1024D/D0EDB64D
fingerprint = AD0A C5DF C426 4F03 5D53  2BDB 18D8 A4E2 D0ED B64D
See http://www.keyserver.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.

"Novell's patent deal with Microsoft [is] enabling Microsoft to run 'a
protection racket' with the threat of its patents." -- Bruce Perens