Re: [Acx100-devel] VLYNQ support

[Carlos <ca...@cm...>]

On Sunday 12 February 2006 19:48, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 14:25 +0100, Carlos Mart=EDn wrote:
>=20
> > Is there any reason why it's better to implement this than use the alre=
ady=20
> > tested (mini-)PCI access method? From the OpenWRT wiki I see that these=
=20
cards=20
> > can talk PCI and VLYNQ.
> The cards can talk PCI, but the board itself can't, even though the slot
> has a MiniPCI form factor.

I see.

>=20
> > > Please let me know if there's anyone in particular that I should talk=
 to
> > > about this.
> >=20
> > It should just be enough to create a file called nlynq.c with the=20
> > method-specific parts and send a diff to Denis.
> Would it be easier to start from the PCI file or the USB file? They seem
> to be implemented somewhat differently...

That's because they're fundamentally different ways of doing things. I woul=
d=20
imagine VLYNQ to be closer to PCI.

>=20
> Btw. you don't need to Cc me, I subscribed to the list...

It's just a matter of use. In my experience, you CC the people who are=20
actively taking part in a conversation, so that they get the email in their=
=20
inbox, rather than in the mailinglist.

   cmn
=2D-=20
Carlos Mart=EDn Nieto    |   http://www.cmartin.tk
Hobbyist programmer    |