Re: [ActiveLock-Development] [ activelock-Support Requests-1013061 ] Module Support

[Dan K. <da...@da...>]

Isnt this just because the VCODE is the same?

He probably didnt regenerate the vcode for the new application name?

Or does the application name not get used here?

> Support Requests item #1013061, was opened at 2004-08-20 18:41
> Message generated for change (Comment added) made by th2tran
> You can respond by visiting:
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1013061&group_id=70007
>
> Category: None
> Group: Support Team
>>Status: Closed
> Resolution: Accepted
> Priority: 5
> Submitted By: Andy Kirk (andykirk)
> Assigned to: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran)
> Summary: Module Support
>
> Initial Comment:
> I have used ActiveLock 1.8 in many projects for a while
> now, but have only just found about this new version 2.
>
> I have an application now, which is split into three
> modules.  Each of these modules (in the same binary)
> need to be licenced seperately, so that the user can
> choose which of the modules they want to run.
>
> i.e,
> Licence 1: Module 1, Module 2 & Module 3
> Licence 2: Module 1 only
> Licence 3: Module 2 only
> Licence 4: Module 2 and 3
>
> I though that one way to do this would be to support
> three seperate active lock components, each with a
> different application name, and then build a screen to
> allow the user to liberate the modules they need.
>
> The problem with this is that when I attempted to
> generate the application codes for the three
> applications (ProTrack-SM, ProTrack-CM, ProTrack-AD)
> all of the codes generated for each application appeared
> to be the same.
>
> Please advise if the desired solution is possible using the
> ActiveLock product.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>>Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran)
> Date: 2004-12-17 09:55
>
> Message:
> Logged In: YES
> user_id=797792
>
> Closed since there's no further followup questions by
> originator.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran)
> Date: 2004-08-20 19:04
>
> Message:
> Logged In: YES
> user_id=797792
>
> Hi Andy,
> You're on the right track.  But what you need to do is: you
> need to  generate a different Software Code for each of your
> modules.  You can't use the same code for all 3 modules,
> otherwise the generated license will be identical.
>
> We will likely implement modular/feature based licensing in
> 2.1.  But for, your suggested approach is the way to go.
>
> /Thanh
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> You can respond by visiting:
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1013061&group_id=70007
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Activelock-Development mailing list
> Act...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/activelock-development
>