Thread: [ActiveLock-Development] [ activelock-Support Requests-1013061 ] Module Support
Brought to you by:
ialkan
Menu
▾
▴
activelock-development
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-20 18:41:54
|
Support Requests item #1013061, was opened at 2004-08-20 18:41 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1013061&group_id=70007 Category: None Group: Support Team Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andy Kirk (andykirk) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Module Support Initial Comment: I have used ActiveLock 1.8 in many projects for a while now, but have only just found about this new version 2. I have an application now, which is split into three modules. Each of these modules (in the same binary) need to be licenced seperately, so that the user can choose which of the modules they want to run. i.e, Licence 1: Module 1, Module 2 & Module 3 Licence 2: Module 1 only Licence 3: Module 2 only Licence 4: Module 2 and 3 I though that one way to do this would be to support three seperate active lock components, each with a different application name, and then build a screen to allow the user to liberate the modules they need. The problem with this is that when I attempted to generate the application codes for the three applications (ProTrack-SM, ProTrack-CM, ProTrack-AD) all of the codes generated for each application appeared to be the same. Please advise if the desired solution is possible using the ActiveLock product. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1013061&group_id=70007 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-20 19:05:04
|
Support Requests item #1013061, was opened at 2004-08-20 18:41 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by th2tran You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1013061&group_id=70007 Category: None Group: Support Team Status: Open >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andy Kirk (andykirk) >Assigned to: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Summary: Module Support Initial Comment: I have used ActiveLock 1.8 in many projects for a while now, but have only just found about this new version 2. I have an application now, which is split into three modules. Each of these modules (in the same binary) need to be licenced seperately, so that the user can choose which of the modules they want to run. i.e, Licence 1: Module 1, Module 2 & Module 3 Licence 2: Module 1 only Licence 3: Module 2 only Licence 4: Module 2 and 3 I though that one way to do this would be to support three seperate active lock components, each with a different application name, and then build a screen to allow the user to liberate the modules they need. The problem with this is that when I attempted to generate the application codes for the three applications (ProTrack-SM, ProTrack-CM, ProTrack-AD) all of the codes generated for each application appeared to be the same. Please advise if the desired solution is possible using the ActiveLock product. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Date: 2004-08-20 19:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=797792 Hi Andy, You're on the right track. But what you need to do is: you need to generate a different Software Code for each of your modules. You can't use the same code for all 3 modules, otherwise the generated license will be identical. We will likely implement modular/feature based licensing in 2.1. But for, your suggested approach is the way to go. /Thanh ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1013061&group_id=70007 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-12-17 09:55:15
|
Support Requests item #1013061, was opened at 2004-08-20 18:41 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by th2tran You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1013061&group_id=70007 Category: None Group: Support Team >Status: Closed Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andy Kirk (andykirk) Assigned to: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Summary: Module Support Initial Comment: I have used ActiveLock 1.8 in many projects for a while now, but have only just found about this new version 2. I have an application now, which is split into three modules. Each of these modules (in the same binary) need to be licenced seperately, so that the user can choose which of the modules they want to run. i.e, Licence 1: Module 1, Module 2 & Module 3 Licence 2: Module 1 only Licence 3: Module 2 only Licence 4: Module 2 and 3 I though that one way to do this would be to support three seperate active lock components, each with a different application name, and then build a screen to allow the user to liberate the modules they need. The problem with this is that when I attempted to generate the application codes for the three applications (ProTrack-SM, ProTrack-CM, ProTrack-AD) all of the codes generated for each application appeared to be the same. Please advise if the desired solution is possible using the ActiveLock product. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Date: 2004-12-17 09:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=797792 Closed since there's no further followup questions by originator. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Date: 2004-08-20 19:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=797792 Hi Andy, You're on the right track. But what you need to do is: you need to generate a different Software Code for each of your modules. You can't use the same code for all 3 modules, otherwise the generated license will be identical. We will likely implement modular/feature based licensing in 2.1. But for, your suggested approach is the way to go. /Thanh ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1013061&group_id=70007 |
|
From: Dan K. <da...@da...> - 2004-12-17 11:46:25
|
Isnt this just because the VCODE is the same? He probably didnt regenerate the vcode for the new application name? Or does the application name not get used here? > Support Requests item #1013061, was opened at 2004-08-20 18:41 > Message generated for change (Comment added) made by th2tran > You can respond by visiting: > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1013061&group_id=70007 > > Category: None > Group: Support Team >>Status: Closed > Resolution: Accepted > Priority: 5 > Submitted By: Andy Kirk (andykirk) > Assigned to: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) > Summary: Module Support > > Initial Comment: > I have used ActiveLock 1.8 in many projects for a while > now, but have only just found about this new version 2. > > I have an application now, which is split into three > modules. Each of these modules (in the same binary) > need to be licenced seperately, so that the user can > choose which of the modules they want to run. > > i.e, > Licence 1: Module 1, Module 2 & Module 3 > Licence 2: Module 1 only > Licence 3: Module 2 only > Licence 4: Module 2 and 3 > > I though that one way to do this would be to support > three seperate active lock components, each with a > different application name, and then build a screen to > allow the user to liberate the modules they need. > > The problem with this is that when I attempted to > generate the application codes for the three > applications (ProTrack-SM, ProTrack-CM, ProTrack-AD) > all of the codes generated for each application appeared > to be the same. > > Please advise if the desired solution is possible using the > ActiveLock product. > > Thanks > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) > Date: 2004-12-17 09:55 > > Message: > Logged In: YES > user_id=797792 > > Closed since there's no further followup questions by > originator. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) > Date: 2004-08-20 19:04 > > Message: > Logged In: YES > user_id=797792 > > Hi Andy, > You're on the right track. But what you need to do is: you > need to generate a different Software Code for each of your > modules. You can't use the same code for all 3 modules, > otherwise the generated license will be identical. > > We will likely implement modular/feature based licensing in > 2.1. But for, your suggested approach is the way to go. > > /Thanh > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > You can respond by visiting: > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1013061&group_id=70007 > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Activelock-Development mailing list > Act...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/activelock-development > |
|
From: Thanh H. T. <th...@sy...> - 2004-12-19 10:08:03
|
> > >Isnt this just because the VCODE is the same? > Yep, sure is. Dan Keeley wrote on 17/12/2004 6:46 AM: >Isnt this just because the VCODE is the same? > >He probably didnt regenerate the vcode for the new application name? > >Or does the application name not get used here? > > > >>Support Requests item #1013061, was opened at 2004-08-20 18:41 >>Message generated for change (Comment added) made by th2tran >>You can respond by visiting: >>https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1013061&group_id=70007 >> >>Category: None >>Group: Support Team >> >> >>>Status: Closed >>> >>> >>Resolution: Accepted >>Priority: 5 >>Submitted By: Andy Kirk (andykirk) >>Assigned to: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) >>Summary: Module Support >> >>Initial Comment: >>I have used ActiveLock 1.8 in many projects for a while >>now, but have only just found about this new version 2. >> >>I have an application now, which is split into three >>modules. Each of these modules (in the same binary) >>need to be licenced seperately, so that the user can >>choose which of the modules they want to run. >> >>i.e, >>Licence 1: Module 1, Module 2 & Module 3 >>Licence 2: Module 1 only >>Licence 3: Module 2 only >>Licence 4: Module 2 and 3 >> >>I though that one way to do this would be to support >>three seperate active lock components, each with a >>different application name, and then build a screen to >>allow the user to liberate the modules they need. >> >>The problem with this is that when I attempted to >>generate the application codes for the three >>applications (ProTrack-SM, ProTrack-CM, ProTrack-AD) >>all of the codes generated for each application appeared >>to be the same. >> >>Please advise if the desired solution is possible using the >>ActiveLock product. >> >>Thanks >> >> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >>>Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) >>> >>> >>Date: 2004-12-17 09:55 >> >>Message: >>Logged In: YES >>user_id=797792 >> >>Closed since there's no further followup questions by >>originator. >> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) >>Date: 2004-08-20 19:04 >> >>Message: >>Logged In: YES >>user_id=797792 >> >>Hi Andy, >>You're on the right track. But what you need to do is: you >>need to generate a different Software Code for each of your >>modules. You can't use the same code for all 3 modules, >>otherwise the generated license will be identical. >> >>We will likely implement modular/feature based licensing in >>2.1. But for, your suggested approach is the way to go. >> >>/Thanh >> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X