Re: [ACPI] [PATCH] lower-latency followup

[Dominik B. <de...@br...>]

On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 08:48:46PM +0200, Arndt Schoenewald wrote:
> ... and it is questionable whether the process is really sped up; after a=
ll
>=20
>     if (a)
> 	if (b)
> 	    if (c)
> 		d;
>=20
> should not be any slower than
>=20
>     if (a && b && c)
> 	d;
>=20
> or even
>=20
>     a && b && c && d;	/* ;-) */

That's true - the only small "improvement" was some sort of hope that more
likely "ifs" are sped up - nothing serious, though.

> But then again, Dominik's code is in fact smaller, so it does have
> its benefits.
And the benefit of cleaning up really fast after an interrupt has been
received.

> PS: I'm having a beer right now! (Sitting on the patio & doing BBQ, WLAN
> makes it happen ;-)
"Prost!"

Dominik