From: Pavel M. <pa...@uc...> - 2002-03-29 21:47:02
|
Hi! > (The first is not necessarily related to the other two, but the other two > were created relative to the first, and it's otherwise innocuous). > > 1. Implements notion of 'system' bus, so system level devices can be added > in a comon spot. This includes things like CPUs, PICs, timers, etc. Good thing, but naming is pretty inconsistent. You have device_register() but register_sys_device(). > Testing welcome also, though I wouldn't expect one to get very far, since > they're not actually used. ;) Which, brings up another question - what > would be the proper place to call device_shutdown()? (I haven't looked > very far into that part...) Tested, seems to work. Pavel PS: On toshiba 4030cdt, I can suspend once without no apparent ill effects. On resume I get utmisc-0373 Ut_acquire_mutex : Invalid acquire order: Thread 5C owns [ACPI_MTX_Hardware], wants [ACPI_MTX_Namespace]. followed by more warnings. Is there easy way to debug this? -- (about SSSCA) "I don't say this lightly. However, I really think that the U.S. no longer is classifiable as a democracy, but rather as a plutocracy." --hpa |