[ACPI] Re: New SmartBattery DSDT-based controller

[Johan V. <jvr...@sq...>]

Matthew Garrett <mj...@sr...> writes:

> The alternative approach of modifying the user's DSDT on the fly is
> likely to be excessively fragile.

Maybe I'm missing something, but isn't the AML interpreter part of the
OS? In that case, it should be possible to have the additional DSDT
code inserted 'on the fly'.

-- Johan