|
From: Dan <da...@in...> - 2004-01-11 21:12:59
|
On Sun, 2004-01-11 at 08:42, Ducrot Bruno wrote: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 05:33:07PM -0800, Dan wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I've recently been trying to get ACPI support up and running on my > > Gateway M350 laptop...using kernel 2.6.1. Everything seems to appear > > > ... > > > dump of my DSDT data, after running it through acpidmp, in case it's > > Please do not use apcidmp. Can you resend the dsdt in raw, or use > something else like iasl or freebsd's acpidump? > My apologies...yes, I'd seen the use of acpidmp mentioned on the ACPI Sourceforge site, as well as on the Gentoo Linux forums, so I figured it was at least a marginally useful tool =) The DSDT in raw format is attached to this email. I've been looking at the patch for the 2.4 kernel series that allows one to fake an ECDT at boot time (with the ecdt_fake parameter passed through Grub/Lilo), and attempting to tinker with it so that it could be applied to the 2.6 kernel tree, but so far I haven't been having much success =\ The kernel compiles with my slightly-modified patch, but it doesn't seem to pick up or use the passed-in ECDT (no debug messages to that effect, anyway, as there should be, and it certainly isn't fixing anything =P), so my assumption is that there's a deeper difference between the 2.4 and 2.6 kernel series with regards to ACPI that will require a little more poking and prodding with this patch =) As my DSDT re-compiles cleanly with iasl, and the errors I'm getting don't seem to indicate anything actually wrong with my DSDT, I'm starting to think that I just need to find a way to pass the ECDT at boot time to fix the problems...I shall continue poking away at the 2.6 tree in an attempt to patch it with the ecdt_fake patch =) ~D. Stone |