|
From: Greg S. <gr...@mo...> - 2004-01-11 16:53:13
|
Hi Ducrot,
The front page of acpi.sourceforge.net suggests that people include the output of apcidmp when posting bug reports. It's toward the bottom of the page. I duplicated the suggestion in a post on the gentoo forums which may be causing some of the trouble. I'll correct my post.
Thanks,
Greg
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 17:42:10 +0100
Ducrot Bruno <du...@po...> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 05:33:07PM -0800, Dan wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've recently been trying to get ACPI support up and running on my
> > Gateway M350 laptop...using kernel 2.6.1. Everything seems to appear
> >
> ...
>
> > dump of my DSDT data, after running it through acpidmp, in case it's
>
> Please do not use apcidmp. Can you resend the dsdt in raw, or use
> something else like iasl or freebsd's acpidump?
>
> BTW, can you tell me if there is some website that say to people
> to use that acpidmp (without the 'u'), and send me the link if there
> is one?
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Ducrot Bruno
>
> -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy?
> -- Don't know. Don't care.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
> Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
> advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
> Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
> _______________________________________________
> Acpi-devel mailing list
> Acp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-devel
>
|