From: Pavel M. <pa...@su...> - 2002-12-08 19:49:59
|
Hi! > > > > > Doesn't that imply your fix is broken to begin with? > > > > > > > > ACPI/S4 support needs swsusp. ACPI/S3 needs big part of > > > > swsusp. Splitting CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP to S3 and S4 part seems like > > > > overdesign to me, OTOH if you do the work it is okay with me. > > > > > > You broke the design. S3 support was developed long before swsusp was in > > > the kernel, and completely indpendent of it. It should have remained that > > > way. > > > > > > S3 support is a subset of what is need for S4 support. > > > > That's not true. acpi_wakeup.S is nasty piece of code, needed for S3 > > but not for S4. Big part of driver support is only needed for S3. > > > > > swsusp is an implementation of S4 support. In theory, there could be > > > multiple implementations that all use the same core (saving/restoring > > > state). > > > > There were patches for S4bios floating around, but it never really > > worked, IIRC. > > No. It work. I do not resubmmited patches because I think that > swsusp is better. I think that s4bios is nice to have. Its similar to S3 and easier to set up than swsusp... It would be nice to have it. Pavel -- Casualities in World Trade Center: ~3k dead inside the building, cryptography in U.S.A. and free speech in Czech Republic. |