[accada-user] still problem with Feig LRU1000

[<dan...@qu...>]

Hi,

i have some trouble with a connection to a FEIG LRU1000 Reader.

I have started an instance of the reader-rprm-core module. I have configured the ReaderDevice_default.xml in reader-rprm-core-0.4.0.jar and the FeigTCPIPController_default.xml in hal-impl-feig-0.4.0. The shell tells me "reader initialized". Following I have started the client-modul. But if I send requests to the core-module i get no answert. I can also see no traffic to the feig-reader in a networksniffer-tool.

Has anybody an idea where the problem is?
------------

I have also tried a the ALE-Modul but I have the following problem:

HALAdapter defined in ALE-Modul:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<LogicalReaders xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="/LogicalReaders.xsd">
<!--Configuration for a HALAdaptor-->
        <LogicalReader name="LogicalReader1">
                <LRSpec isComposite="false" readerType="org.accada.ale.server.readers.hal.HALAdaptor">
                        <LRProperty name="Description"  value="My first HAL device reader"/>
                        <LRProperty name="AdaptorClass" value="org.accada.hal.impl.feig.FeigTCPIPController"/>
                        <LRProperty name="PhysicalReaderName" value="Feig LRU1000"/>
                        <LRProperty name="ReadTimeInterval" value="1000"/>
                        <LRProperty name="ReadPoints" value="Shelf1,Shelf2"/>
                        <LRProperty name="PropertiesFile"
                                value="/props/FeigTCPIPController.xml"/>
                </LRSpec>
        </LogicalReader>
</LogicalReaders>

The question is in which config file must be the class org.accada.hal.impl.feig.FeigTCPIPController defined for connection to the physical reader? 

Why must be the tag <simType> be defined? I doesn't need the simulator.

Has anybody a sample implementation (inclusive configuration) ideally for the Feig LRU1000?

Best regards
Daniel
-- 
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört?
Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger