Search Results for "attacker"

...This enhanced security adds some delay ONLY to the opening of encrypted partitions without any performance impact to the application use phase. This is acceptable to the legitimate owner but it makes it much harder for an attacker to gain access to the encrypted data. All released files are PGP signed with key ID=0x680D16DE, available on key servers and downloadable at https://www.idrix.fr/VeraCrypt/VeraCrypt_PGP_public_key.asc VeraCrypt can mount TrueCrypt volumes. It also can convert them to VeraCrypt format. Documentation: https://www.veracrypt.fr/en/Documentation.html FAQ : https://www.veracrypt.fr/en/FAQ.html

VaultSync keeps synchronised data backups from one or more computers in an encrypted vault that is locked with a password. It is optimised to operate on a flash or external drive with minimal installation but it can also work on a hosted storage system like Dropbox, One Drive or Google Drive. It is really important that a backup is simple and fast to make. There is no point in having to decide what files are important or what has changed at the time of the backup, or having to manually...

...It takes a string and brute-forces a prefix for it so that the hash of the string with the prefix has a certain number of leading zeroes. But that alone would've been too easy to hack. To prevent an attacker from forging the keys by generating a new prefix: the hash latch doesn't output the keys in the plaintext. Instead, it encrypts the key and outputs the ciphertext. That means that instead of giving you the actual key, it gives you a safe containing the key. This approach allows the hash latch to protect itself from forged keys and also enables you to put the same key into multiple safes without the recipients of these safes knowing they have the same key (even if they compare their ciphertexts). ...

...The idea is that the platform machine `works encrypted' for the user and unencrypted for the operator, running a machine code instruction set in user mode that is provably safe against computational attacks, for code that is generated by a compiler that has introduced random variations into the code at each recompilation so that the attacker has no statistical leverage from human programming biases.