Maciej Witkowiak

Show:

What's happening?

  • Program stores absolute pathnames

    I have to move qtstalker files between different user accounts and I found that the path names stored in e.g. portfolio/scanner/backtester rules are absolute. It would be nice to have them relative to the qtstalker's user data&configuration directory ($HOME/.qtstalker).

    2005-12-18 19:36:39 UTC in Qtstalker

  • Some usability fixes

    Hello! I'm a new qtstalker user but I'm already convinced that this is a great piece of software. However as a newbie I had some problems learning to use it. This is why I have some suggestions that (I hope) will make qtstalker easier and more pleasant to use. 1. When adding a new indicator, please change drop-down QComboBox to a somewhat bigger window with QListView insid.

    2005-08-24 14:58:24 UTC in Qtstalker

  • Comment: big problems with scanner and Kodak camera

    Logged In: YES user_id=48608 Look at the bug 866317. I had similar problems with Kodak camera. It seems that switching to libusb-0.1.8, gphoto2-2.1.5 and Linux kernel 2.6.12-rc4 solved it.

    2005-05-15 23:44:39 UTC in libusb

  • Comment: libusb and Linux 2.6.0

    Logged In: YES user_id=48608 Now I have libusb-0.1.8, gphoto2-2.1.5 and Linux kernel 2.6.12-rc4 - with this combination problem no longer exists. I can connect and interact with camera multiple times without any disruptions. It seems that indeed this was problem with the kernel.

    2005-05-15 23:41:16 UTC in libusb

  • LUnix Next Generation

    ytm committed patchset 235 of module lng to the LUnix Next Generation CVS repository, changing 1 files.

    2005-04-09 12:32:10 UTC in LUnix Next Generation

  • LUnix Next Generation

    ytm committed patchset 234 of module lng to the LUnix Next Generation CVS repository, changing 2 files.

    2005-04-09 12:26:19 UTC in LUnix Next Generation

  • Comment: Wrong label in lng-0.21/kernel/atari/keyboard.s

    Logged In: YES user_id=48608 This has been just fixed, thanks!

    2005-04-09 12:26:05 UTC in LUnix Next Generation

  • Followup: RE: Internal C128 1028k expansion

    No. I have Marko's 512K expansion installed and it is not supported either. Originally I wanted to use the extra RAM for apps but the code never worked and was hard to debug. That RAM will be definietly used by ramdisk filesystem that is still to be written.

    2005-03-08 17:01:04 UTC in LUnix Next Generation

  • Comment: Disk Cache

    Logged In: YES user_id=48608 Because of the way that CBM drives work and talk with C64 a true disk caching is near to impossible. Note that it's the drive that seeks a file in directory. LNG only sends the filename. I have been thinking about a ramdisk for start. Then, all that available extra ram from REU, C128 bank1 etc. could be utilized...

    2004-10-14 16:28:12 UTC in LUnix Next Generation

  • Followup: RE: RetroReplay + RRNet Adapter

    1. Yes, it is possible and will work but first someone has to write proper drivers. Not earlier :-). Two new modules are needed: a PKG module that would handle packet queue, buffers and ARP packets, and a ETH module that would actually talk to hardware and push data there. Just like it is with serial stuff - there is one SLIP module and some more RS232 drivers. 2. In source tarball take a...

    2004-10-02 12:04:38 UTC in LUnix Next Generation

About Me

  • 2000-07-07 (9 years ago)
  • 48608
  • ytm (My Site)
  • Maciej Witkowiak

Send me a message