Thank you. Private message sent.
2013-04-12 15:17:44 PDT in MinGW-w64 - for 3...
Hey nightstrike, I could really use your help. Would it be all right for me to send you a private email? Does your SF account forward to your regular mail? If not, you can send me your email using my address from the posting I did to the list, or you can send it to me here (https://sourceforge.net/sendmessage.php?touser=1220080).
2013-04-10 13:23:21 PDT in MinGW-w64 - for 3...
I just posted it to the list tonight, so we'll see what happens. A "monster" post like that can easily get dismissed. All the more so since it is about inline assembler. Not everyone is knowledgeable about how that works. I have a few other (somewhat simpler) questions to ask, but I think I'll wait to see what happens to this one first. As for the forum, well, it's a bit...
2013-03-27 20:35:31 PDT in MinGW-w64 - for 3...
ktietz70? Are you still there? I've got other issues stacking up. If you're not interested, I'll just keep updating my local copy.
2013-03-26 15:36:52 PDT in MinGW-w64 - for 3...
And if this looks right, I have a few more questions before you do a checkin.
2013-03-21 17:13:41 PDT in MinGW-w64 - for 3...
Well, I will see your specification and raise you a code sample. To be sure I was running what you were running, I grabbed the def for _bittest from the winnt.h file you just updated and pasted it directly into my sample: [code]#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> typedef unsigned char BOOLEAN; typedef long LONG; typedef long __LONG32; __CRT_INLINE BOOLEAN...
2013-03-21 15:16:31 PDT in MinGW-w64 - for 3...
Wonderful! Thank you so much for fixing this. I was just beginning to discover that my "solution" was nothing of the sort, and I wasn't looking forward to digging into gcc's inline assembler to sort this all out. Umm, I hate to be greedy here, but since you are there, could you look at _bittest64? I'm thinking it's got the same problem.
2013-03-20 18:15:16 PDT in MinGW-w64 - for 3...
I am trying to port my app from msvc to gcc. Since it is x64, that brought me here. However, I have been having problems with the inline assembler routines in winnt.h. Specifically, they seem to be inefficient and (more importantly) give the wrong answers. You can see the discussion [here](http://stackoverflow.com/a/15532980/2189500), but in essence, _BitScanForward, _BitScanReverse...
2013-03-20 15:08:47 PDT in MinGW-w64 - for 3...