-
Logged In: YES
user_id=396953
>> source code gets manipulated _after_ analyzation phase
> Yup, tricky. Unit test time!
To be a little bit more exact, the actual _code_ won't get
manipulated, but the source file will. No alterations will be
made after the class/interface descriptor line, so the only
thing that get's altered/added is the Javadoc comment.
It would be...
2003-12-08 17:57:28 UTC in PMD
-
Logged In: YES
user_id=396953
Got the first version ready. Still few things to be done (like
word-wrapping lines over 80 characters), but it's a good start
anyway. Here's an excerpt from one of the result files:
-- excerpt begins --
/**
* <p>The <code>BootstrapServlet</code> performs the
ObjectFactory
* startup procedure in J2EE environment.</p>
*
*...
2003-12-08 17:14:45 UTC in PMD
-
Logged In: YES
user_id=396953
I started writing the "AddCommentRenderer" implementation.
It works now, but it's not very elegant yet. One particular
problem is that the developer must set the "shortFilenames"
attribute to "false" from the ANT task, because otherwise
RuleViolation.getFilename() returns the filename as relative.
As long as you remember to...
2003-12-08 15:38:57 UTC in PMD
-
Logged In: YES
user_id=396953
I believe the class comment would be a good place for it. An
example:
/**
* <p>The <code>MyClass </code> class blah blah ...</p>
*
* <p>The PMD code analyzer was run on this class
* (2003/12/05 at 12:00) with following results:</p>
*
* <p>
* <ul>
* <li>...
2003-12-05 09:20:23 UTC in PMD
-
Hi. First of all, I have just taken my first test-drive with
PMD, and I must admit it really rocks!
One feature that I would like to see is an option to write
examination results directly to those Java source files
they are targeted at, instead of writing a separate
report file.
A report file is a good choice in most cases, but the
developers tend to forget that it's there. If...
2003-12-04 14:13:35 UTC in PMD
-
There's a bug in the 'roundDown(int unit,Calendar
unRounded)' method
in RecurranceRuleRfc class. This bug applies to
recurrence rules
having frequency 'WEEKLY', depending on which period
end date has been set.
Here's how to see the bug in action (insert this code
somewhere
in the RecurrenceRuleRfc class so that it will be
executed when
you test it):
----- code snippet begins...
2003-10-10 10:07:38 UTC in Recur
-
Here's an excerpt of my test log:
[java] Weekly rules:
[java] Every week on Tuesday and Thursday:
[java] FREQ=WEEKLY;BYDAY=TU,TH
[java] All occurrences:
[java] 1) Tue Sep 16 14:29:45 EEST 2003
[java] 2) Thu Sep 18 14:29:45 EEST 2003
...
[java] 31) Tue Dec 30 14:29:45 EET 2003
[java] 32) Tue Jan 06...
2003-09-16 11:56:22 UTC in Recur
-
Logged In: YES
user_id=396953
I found the same thing. In my case, I tried to get the last
Friday in August. Instead, I got the last Friday in December.
I got it working by replacing "BYDAY=-1FR"
with "BYDAY=FR;BYSETPOS=-1".
2003-09-15 12:30:09 UTC in Recur
-
Logged In: YES
user_id=396953
I tried to test the new version today, but CVS problems
prevented me from testing it. We tried the 1.4.1 release
though, but the problem still existed there. I presume that the
1.4.1 version does not yet contain the new attachment
filename handling procedure, which is only present in the
current CVS head? Am I correct?
Currently, CVS checkout seems to...
2003-07-10 13:19:40 UTC in SquirrelMail
-
Logged In: YES
user_id=396953
I'm currently away from the office, so I can't test it right
now. I can perform the tests next week.
2003-07-02 10:19:00 UTC in SquirrelMail
