Scott Copus

NAPS2 name origin?

I think this should explain my Proxmox disk layout, sourced from my Clonezilla's image export blkdev.list file. Also uploaded to https://pastebin.com/CUx9Zwx6 . As you can tell, my Proxmox is on nvme0n1. KNAME NAME SIZE TYPE FSTYPE MOUNTPOINT MODEL loop0 loop0 367.3M loop squashfs /usr/lib/live/mount/rootfs/filesystem.squashfs sda sda 3.6T disk WDC WD40EFRX-68WT0N0 sda1 `-sda1 3.6T part ntfs /home/partimag sdb sdb 3.6T disk WDC WD40EFRX-68WT0N0 sdb1 |-sdb1 128M part sdb2 `-sdb2 3.6T part ntfs sdc...

I think this should explain my Proxmox disk layout, sourced from my Clonezilla's image export blkdev.list file. Also uploaded to https://pastebin.com/CUx9Zwx6. As you can tell, my Proxmox is on nvme0n1. KNAME NAME SIZE TYPE FSTYPE MOUNTPOINT MODEL loop0 loop0 367.3M loop squashfs /usr/lib/live/mount/rootfs/filesystem.squashfs sda sda 3.6T disk WDC WD40EFRX-68WT0N0 sda1 `-sda1 3.6T part ntfs /home/partimag sdb sdb 3.6T disk WDC WD40EFRX-68WT0N0 sdb1 |-sdb1 128M part sdb2 `-sdb2 3.6T part ntfs sdc...

I think this should explain my Proxmox disk layout, sourced from my Clonezilla's image export blkdev.list file. Also uploaded to https://pastebin.com/ve22fJ1D. As you can tell, my Proxmox is on nvme0n1. KNAME NAME SIZE TYPE FSTYPE MOUNTPOINT MODEL loop0 loop0 367.3M loop squashfs /usr/lib/live/mount/rootfs/filesystem.squashfs sda sda 3.6T disk WDC WD40EFRX-68WT0N0 sda1 `-sda1 3.6T part ntfs /home/partimag sdb sdb 3.6T disk WDC WD40EFRX-68WT0N0 sdb1 |-sdb1 128M part sdb2 `-sdb2 3.6T part ntfs sdc...

I did a full disk backup of my Proxmox drive and also got the same "Broken partition images were found, or some of them are not checkable in this image" message too. I didn't think to make copies of the log files as I thought Clonezilla might have copied them over to my image directory, but I don't have them any longer. However, I still have a 300+GB folder it created called "2024-08-17-17-img" in case there's anything I can attach here to help troubleshoot. thanks, Scott

What is meant by "some of them are not checkable" ? Does this translate to a partition wasn't identifiable?

Anytime Clonezilla has to end up using dd, does it always give this message at the end? "Broken partition images were found, or some of them are not checkable in this image"

What do you think about my previous suggestions to help improve Clonezilla? I think they would help reduce confusion. thanks, Scott