-
So, if the problem is with ekiga.net, has anyone contacted them about it yet?.
2009-10-13 05:50:34 UTC in Sofia-SIP
-
Thanks for the advice and sorry for being confused. It's all working fine now.
2009-08-20 13:17:11 UTC in DocBook
-
> No. You use titlepage.templates.xml (NOT titlepage.templates.xsl) as the
> starting point of a custom titlepage spec file. Please read the docs
> again.
Ah, yes, sorry, the documentation does indeed say "To create your title page spec file for FO output, you can copy fo/titlepage.templates.xml". I did use the .xml file for fo, but seem to be using an .xsl file for xhtml.
However, though the...
2009-08-14 14:48:58 UTC in DocBook
-
> From your description it looks as if you are applying
> template/titlepage.xsl to titlepage.templates.xsl. That is not right. You
> should apply template/titlepage.xsl to your custom titlepage spec file.
However, titlepage.templates.xsl may be used as the start of a custom titlepage spec file, right? That's working fine for me with fo, and for xhtml if I make the correction.
I guess...
2009-08-14 10:14:35 UTC in DocBook
-
Following the instructions here,
http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/TitlePageNewElems.html
produces this error when trying to generate xhtml:
compilation error: file html_customization_layer_titlepage.xsl line 3 element stylesheet
xsl:exclude-result-prefixes : undefined namespace exsl
I think that's because the generated html_customization_layer_titlepage.xsl file is missing...
2009-08-12 13:28:24 UTC in DocBook
-
Yes, sorry for just skimming the documentation.
2009-08-12 09:46:35 UTC in DocBook
-
http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/fo/titlepage.templates.xml
contains this:
but the http://nwalsh.com/docbook/xsl/*...
2009-08-05 11:40:49 UTC in DocBook
-
> Add the following to your customization layer:
Sorry, I don't know how to use a customization layer. Is that just a XSL file that I should use instead of the regular fo XSL file, which includes the regular one?.
2008-09-24 08:06:20 UTC in DocBook
-
No, I don't think this should be closed, because there's obviously a missing link. I have retitled the bug.
2008-08-29 22:07:00 UTC in DocBook
-
Yes, I want to use section, or something, to divide the appendix up into groups of reference sections.
I find it very strange that the reader would ever have to use the Next link to actually see the content in a section, with no clue that that's what he must do. I don't see the point of a link to the TOC or to the page itself.
2008-08-09 08:29:21 UTC in DocBook
