-
Can we close this patch?.
2009-10-08 18:47:57 UTC in UPX - a powerful executable packer
-
Why does the world need yet another alpha-quality, incompatible DOS extender?
Anyway, moving this topic to Feature Requests...
2008-07-05 14:43:34 UTC in UPX - a powerful executable packer
-
You should add some define like -D__BIG_ENDIAN__ to your compiler flags.
2008-05-15 11:34:35 UTC in UPX - a powerful executable packer
-
Messing with process priorities is really bad practice - that's the job of the OS.
2008-04-28 12:52:24 UTC in UPX - a powerful executable packer
-
Both wildcard expansion and argument parsing is handled by the win32 C runtime (I think that's msvcrt.dll), and this handling should be compatible with other windows programs.
There may be some special rules if you need both quoting (for spaces) and wildcard expansion, but I'm no expert - maybe someone else (in the forums) knows more.
2008-04-14 14:00:23 UTC in UPX - a powerful executable packer
-
We will *NOT* add any sort of protection and/or encryption. Please see the README for mor info.
2008-04-14 08:09:28 UTC in UPX - a powerful executable packer
-
I'd guess that adding a /lib64 symlink should work. Otherwise you have to setup some chroot environment or compile from source.
2008-04-14 08:06:20 UTC in UPX - a powerful executable packer
-
There are already a number of 3rd party GUI frontends.
2008-04-14 08:04:55 UTC in UPX - a powerful executable packer
-
FYI, there are currently no plans to enhance --exact beyond what's implemented in UPX 3.02. This has both technical (high impact on source code) and political (e.g. Anti-Virus vendor support) reasons.
Authors who really care about byte-identical versions should use the one-time compress-decompress workaround mentioned in the docs.
~Markus.
2008-02-06 03:05:48 UTC in UPX - a powerful executable packer
-
Should be fixed in 3.02.
2008-01-02 10:59:21 UTC in UPX - a powerful executable packer
