A.B.

Show:

What's happening?

  • Followup: RE: BSD-friendly license for deflate compression?

    sorry for bumping old thread, found it just now ... > Recently I downloaded the LZMA SDK, hoping that I could use it for > producing well-compressed deflate streams. I noticed, however, that > the SDK supports LZMA compression only. now also LZMA2 > adapting the 7zip LGPL-licensed code is too restrictive But there is one more problem: The Deflate code is also C++ only, no plain...

    2009-11-08 05:42:09 UTC in 7-Zip

  • Followup: RE: 7-zip Limits

    > Can 7-zip compress files that are over 100 Giga Bytes in size YES. (Hint: 2^30 Bytes = 1 GiB) > and allow users to combine up to 8000 files into a single ZIP archive? YES. (Hint: 7-ZIP format is better than ZIP if you have >=4 GiB sizes or >65535 files)

    2009-11-08 05:30:57 UTC in 7-Zip

  • Followup: RE: 7-Zip 4.65 command line - prompt for password

    Again ??? sf..net/projects/sevenzip/forums/forum/45797/topic/3405292 sf.net/projects/sevenzip/forums/forum/45797/topic/2618234 board.flatassembler.net/download.php?id=3981.

    2009-10-30 04:17:33 UTC in 7-Zip

  • Followup: RE: Version 9? Are you serious?

    goldart_geo wrote: > Why 7-Zip suddenly jumps to version 9 anyway, especially when versions 5 to 8 have never been released? Already discussed: "4" started in 2004, now in 2009 Igor jumped to "9" :-) > Although 7-Zip is currently soliciting for monetary donation and need > creative marketing to gain sponsors, it is irresponsible for > developers to...

    2009-10-30 04:13:19 UTC in 7-Zip

  • Followup: RE: upx.exe reported as infected by mcafee

    http://sf.net/projects/upx/forums/forum/6806/topic/2194914 http://sf.net/projects/upx/forums/forum/6806/topic/1728625.

    2009-10-24 04:18:00 UTC in UPX - a powerful executable packer

  • Followup: RE: upx.exe reported as infected by mcafee

    > The win32 version of upx.exe and the executables compressed with it are being (falsely?) This had been reported already 1'000'000'000'000 times. UPX is UPX'ed itself as well. Bug authors of mcafee and esafe about this "problem".

    2009-10-24 04:14:28 UTC in UPX - a powerful executable packer

  • Followup: RE: How to restore stripped headers from UPX

    Hehe ... many utils to strip UPX headers around (license violation ?), many stripped EXE's (???), but I haven't yet seen any tool to restore them. It's definitely possible (as long as the file runs), but one migh have to look into the stub disassembly.

    2009-10-24 04:09:08 UTC in UPX - a powerful executable packer

  • Followup: RE: Invalid password but not actually invalid?

    Looks like a BUG or you updated the archive with a different PWD or the archive is no too solid and corrupted.

    2009-10-21 06:17:40 UTC in 7-Zip

  • Followup: RE: Encrypt File

    > is there any command for encrypting an existing non-encrypted > archive, without having to extract / compress ? AFAIK NO ... > If not this could be a new feature suggestion (?) YES, it should be doable, but some features like "encrypt headers" , "solidity" and "recovery" (not yet in) complicate it. Also, I'd like to have the encryption...

    2009-10-21 06:14:55 UTC in 7-Zip

  • Followup: RE: Visibility of the password ? (On Dos Prompt)

    > Visibility of the password ? Already asked 1'000'000'000 times. > (On Dos Prompt) Monitor > Is it possible to secure password to others views ? In DOS (and ONLY in DOS) - YES: http://sf.net/projects/sevenzip/forums/forum/45797/topic/2618234?message=5728671 http://board.flatassembler.net/download.php?id=3981.

    2009-10-21 05:55:51 UTC in 7-Zip

About Me

  • 2007-06-04 (2 years ago)
  • 1808177
  • dos386 (My Site)
  • A.B.

Send me a message