Sean Morrison

Show:

What's happening?

  • Comment: Make error in Snow Leopard for openNURBS

    That log does indicate that X11 was detected and should be usable. Does make succeed?.

    2010-01-03 16:53:57 UTC in BRL-CAD

  • Comment: Make error in Snow Leopard for openNURBS

    Ah, so the plot dethickens a little bit. I assumed you were on Linux with the version numbers you reported from autogen.sh, which is what those package names I was referring to were for. The good news is that the autogen.sh warnings are benign (seen via the verbose log), so that's not something we'll probably have to worry about. The reason they're blathering and the reason it fails to find...

    2010-01-03 16:14:17 UTC in BRL-CAD

  • Comment: Make error in Snow Leopard for openNURBS

    The autogen.sh failures are some other misconfiguration on your system, and not necessary to resolve given the other problem was identified (O2/O3). But now that you've run it, might as well investigate the cause. Run this: sh autogen.sh --verbose Provide the entire output from that. You'll also need to 1) install the X11 library and developer headers (usually an xlib-dev or x11-dev...

    2010-01-02 22:41:01 UTC in BRL-CAD

  • Comment: Make error in Snow Leopard for openNURBS

    Ah, that's a recent bug in gcc. You have to compile that one file with -O2 instead of -O3. To do that, you can either remove --enable-optimized from your configure line or run this: make CXXFLAGS=-O2.

    2010-01-02 21:59:35 UTC in BRL-CAD

  • Comment: Make error in Snow Leopard for openNURBS

    You need to provide the log from the last compilation line forward, not just the final error statement. It will be a line that says something like "/bin/sh ../../libtool --silent ..." When in doubt, make sure you have autoconf, automake, and libtool installed and run "sh autogen.sh" from the top of the source hierarchy.

    2010-01-02 17:45:59 UTC in BRL-CAD

  • Followup: RE: how to do solids of extrusion or rotation?

    Britton, How difficult that task is very much depends on who is doing it, does it not? Generally speaking for a capable developer, it's not that difficult at all. There is an existing 2D profile that is easily tessellated, just leaving the task of stitching representative surface patches together. The only reason it's not complete is that it's a very new primitive, implemented by a summer...

    2010-01-02 06:53:29 UTC in BRL-CAD

  • Followup: RE: Wireframe

    There are two commands that will generally give wireframes with more lines. They are the "E" and "ev" commands. You can use those instead of the "e" (i.e., "draw") command to display an 'evaluated' polygonal representation of geometry. Note that given those two commands evaluate geometry, they can be expensive (i.e., take a long time to draw) or may not even succeed if the geometry is...

    2010-01-02 06:14:04 UTC in BRL-CAD

  • BRL-CAD

    brlcad committed revision 37095 to the BRL-CAD SVN repository, changing 1 files.

    2010-01-01 00:49:41 UTC in BRL-CAD

  • BRL-CAD

    brlcad committed revision 37094 to the BRL-CAD SVN repository, changing 1 files.

    2009-12-31 18:45:23 UTC in BRL-CAD

  • BRL-CAD

    brlcad committed revision 37093 to the BRL-CAD SVN repository, changing 11 files.

    2009-12-31 10:48:25 UTC in BRL-CAD